JaVale McGee?

[ghoti]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jun 6 2008, 12:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jun 6 2008, 11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I have no idea which of these two will play harder or develop a better work ethic or any of that stuff. I doubt anybody really knows that even after getting to know them.

I'd draft Jordan because he is a naturally bigger guy and if everything goes perfectly for both he should be more dominant.

These guys seem too risky, but I don't think they should be dismissed so easily in this draft, because there are very few sure things with high ceilings.

There are lots of solid rotation guys and terrific role players, but that's not what teams are looking for in the lottery.</div>

Sounds like you've been reviewing Kiki's draft history and are attempting to rationalize the selection of one of these guys.
</div>

I think there's a decent chance both of them will be gone by the time the Nets pick.

 

[Universe]

I would rather not have either but if I had to chose between the two, I'd pick McGee. He seems like he could be a Big Z type role for us but with more speed and everything.

This 10th pick sucks because you could snag the same type of talent between 15 and 20 as well.

 

[Netted]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Universe @ Jun 6 2008, 01:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I would rather not have either but if I had to chose between the two, I'd pick McGee. He seems like he could be a Big Z type role for us but with more speed and everything.

This 10th pick sucks because you could snag the same type of talent between 15 and 20 as well.</div>
Yeah I think the talent drop off in this draft is after the 1st two and then after around #7 or 8 and then again around #25. #9 through #24 are a crap shoot. Out of those 16 players I think you'll get 5 future NBA starters, 5 rotation guys, and 6 busts.

At least we have 2 shots at someone that will contribute to this team.