OddEnormous
I'M FLYING!! I'M FLYING!!
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2009
- Messages
- 2,476
- Likes
- 54
- Points
- 48
So I guess when a story gets written that may or may not contain new information that could potentially change the conventional wisdom it's 'parroting' to discuss that story's merit?
You're right, better to keep toeing the "KP is is your god" line blindly, that's much better.
:sqwak:
I think KP is a god?
That's interesting.
This is not conventional wisdom. This is one article by Pete V, and a pretty bad at that.
You're the one who said it was conventional wisdom. Meaning every one knew it was Patterson.
That's absolute bullshit and you know it is.
And none of it is "new information." There's no information in it at all.
There's no story of how Patterson ran that draft. No details. It's just another wank Anti KP article from "sources" with nothing of substance in it.
But you and the others will eat this shit up like a giant saltine fucking cracker.
Last edited:






