JJ Hickson

[MickZagger]

Would he be our best bench player if he was still a 'Zer?

 

[Natebishop3]

Would he be our best bench player if he was still a 'Zer?

I'm still not convinced he'd be happy coming off the bench though.

 

[HailBlazers]

Would be a nice option for sure.

 

[RoyToy]

So am I still a troll for saying Hickson is T-Rob's ceiling?

Just. Listen. To. Me.

 

[Strenuus]

So am I still a troll for saying Hickson is T-Rob's ceiling?

Just. Listen. To. Me.

When did you say that?

 

[BBert]

Yes, he would.

But he isn't.

 

[jlprk]

Why would we want a player who was 9th in defensive rebounding %, 12th in total reb %, and 30th in offensive reb %?

He must be selfish, and we wouldn’t want the league’s #12 rebounder if he’s selfishly grabbing every rebound available.

He wouldn’t be a sub without complaining. He wouldn’t sign for under $8 million a year. He wouldn’t…

 

[MARIS61]

I'd rather have McBob back. He has developed into a solid all over the court player, and he fills the stat sheet nicely on my Yahoo team.

 

[MARIS61]

Meyers Leonard is our team's leading rebounder with 12.5 per 36 minutes.

He's our runaway leader in defensive rebounds at 9.5 per 36 minutes.

So maybe he ought to play, at least a little bit, in every game.

 

[Rastapopoulos]

No, he'd be our worst starter, because if he was still a Blazer we wouldn't've been able to get Lopez.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

So am I still a troll for saying Hickson is T-Rob's ceiling?

Just. Listen. To. Me.

That's a two-part question that shouldn't be tied together as one question, so you get two separate answers.

Part one, yes. Part two, no (if you said that).