Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow! Kanter has taken this to a whole new level! I think they play eachother tomorrow night.
No way the league allows him to wear those shoes in the game!
LeBron is a cheap target. Why doesn't Kanter put a whole bunch of shit about CJ on his shoes since CJ is the one with the shoe deal with an actual Chinese apparel company? LeBron isn't blameless but if Kanter was serious he would stop targeting LeBron and start targeting the league. I think this article is pretty on point.Oh, Enes likes to take their money (who wouldn't?), but I respect that he doesn't kiss their ass. Getting paid is one thing, getting paid by kissing asses is quite another.
Question. How many more common people do you think look into it if he targets lebron vs if he targets cj?LeBron is a cheap target. Why doesn't Kanter put a whole bunch of shit about CJ on his shoes since CJ is the one with the shoe deal with an actual Chinese apparel company? LeBron isn't blameless but if Kanter was serious he would stop targeting LeBron and start targeting the league. I think this article is pretty on point.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...-about-china-nearly-everyone-else-ncna1069131
oI miss Kanter.
No disrespect, but I don't agree with you at all.As long as Kanter is still making millions of dollars in a league that makes money off of media distribution in China and owns a Chinese league in conjunction with the "People's Republic" of Xi Jinping and enslaving Muslims, he can step the fuck off his hypocritical soapbox. Just because he doesn't have a shoe deal with a major sportswear company, the dude is clean? The idea that any of us are separating ourselves from China and not feeding their economy is ridiculous and targeting people that are more involved in Chinese business is just foolishness.
I think as long as we're not calling out all of the companies making billions off of their corporate relationships with China then leave the small fish like LeBron alone. It's either Kanter being stupid about who he's targeting or just targeting the name with the most fans that won't get him blackballed, so he can heighten his status as an activist. Protesting LeBron is like having a philosophical problem with Comcast and screaming at one of their customer service reps about it.No disrespect, but I don't agree with you at all.
Yes, we're all complicit, no argument. HOWEVER, people who make 100s of millions of dollars are in a position to do something about it. My salary? Not so much.
Again, as a Laker hater, I certainly don't mind LBJ being targeted, but yeah, it should apply to Lillard, and everyone else making gynormous $$$ deals with shoe companies.
I think as long as we're not calling out all of the companies making billions off of their corporate relationships with China then leave the small fish like LeBron alone. It's either Kanter being stupid about who he's targeting or just targeting the name with the most fans that won't get him blackballed, so he can heighten his status as an activist. Protesting LeBron is like having a philosophical problem with Comcast and screaming at one of their customer service reps about it.
Yeah, I went a little small with the customer service analogy but if you think that LeBron has power to change the business model of the entire apparel industry, you're the one being silly. If you can name a shoe company that LeBron could go to who will pay him close to 30M a year that doesn't do business with China, then you can claim he has agency. The fact is that Kanter is doing exactly what I said, he's targeting someone with a big name that can't possibly hurt Kanter's bottom line. It's fucking weak.Come on, James isn't a "small fish," nor is he comparable to a customer service rep. I'm not disputing that there's a bigger system that James is simply a part of, but it's like having a problem with how telecomms get regulatory breaks from the government and blasting the CEO of Comcast. Sure, the CEO of Comcast didn't create the problem and can't fix it himself, but he enriches himself off it more than almost anyone and is a very willing enabler and proponent. You can still argue that this is the wrong target for your ire, but acting like he's a cog with no agency or power (like a customer service rep) is silly.
Yeah, I went a little small with the customer service analogy but if you think that LeBron has power to change the business model of the entire apparel industry, you're the one being silly. If you can name a shoe company that LeBron could go to who will pay him close to 30M a year that doesn't do business with China, then you can claim he has agency. The fact is that Kanter is doing exactly what I said, he's targeting someone with a big name that can't possibly hurt Kanter's bottom line. It's fucking weak.
Just wait until his new brown and plaid Blazers jersey comes out next season.Really regret not buying the Brown Kanter jersey last year now.
Question. How many more common people do you think look into it if he targets lebron vs if he targets cj?
I dont think he is trying to bring lebron down per say, but using him as a platform for a much larger audience than what cj could provide.
lebron isnt a cheap target, he is the biggest target to create waves. Smart move by Kanter.
Yeah, I went a little small with the customer service analogy but if you think that LeBron has power to change the business model of the entire apparel industry, you're the one being silly. If you can name a shoe company that LeBron could go to who will pay him close to 30M a year that doesn't do business with China, then you can claim he has agency. The fact is that Kanter is doing exactly what I said, he's targeting someone with a big name that can't possibly hurt Kanter's bottom line. It's fucking weak.

Yeah, I went a little small with the customer service analogy but if you think that LeBron has power to change the business model of the entire apparel industry, you're the one being silly.
LeBron makes far far more headlines than CJ does but targeting the wrong guy because he's famous and can't cost you anything is not admirable. LeBron does not negotiate (nor do the other 284 Nike sponsored NBA players) where the shoes are made or sold. Going after MJ would make way bigger headlines and he has a say in manufacturing and sales of some Nike apparel but MJ is pretty powerful and could affect Kanter's livelihood so I guess Kanter should single out one guy who really just wears shoes and makes ads instead of anyone who creates the problem.whats weak is not answering the question above but still ranting and ranting.![]()
LeBron makes far far more headlines than CJ does but targeting the wrong guy because he's famous and can't cost you anything is not admirable. LeBron does not negotiate (nor do the other 284 Nike sponsored NBA players) where the shoes are made or sold. Going after MJ would make way bigger headlines and he has a say in manufacturing and sales of some Nike apparel but MJ is pretty powerful and could affect Kanter's livelihood so I guess Kanter should single out one guy who really just wears shoes and makes ads instead of anyone who creates the problem.
So once again people want players/companies to “take stands” against the very people who have put them in the very fortunate position that they are in? It’s not LeBron’s place to take a stand. Cash those checks, support his family and basically put a whole town’s youth through college. Thats his mission and I respect it. Business is all about making money. Good for him. I have a family to take care of, I’d do the exact same thing. Kanter who I’ve always supported, is WAY out of line on this one. He should do some deep digging on where his income is coming from, then talk."The Shoe Deal"
Talk to any kid who aspires to be an NBA great player and they will follow up with a shoe deal. It's almost the right of passage kind of thing.
You need to pick your battles wisely.
Pretty much every player with a shoe deal in the league is a shill for a shoe company with similar labor practices to Nike. Something like 283 players besides LeBron shill for Nike. Their's this guy who is more famous than LeBron James who used to play and owns the Hornets who is more than a shill for Nike, he's a partner with them but MJ could probably make Kanter's life harder, just like going after Kanter's own teammates would. So, yeah he's totally justified in signalling one guy out and having a China's dictator crowning him, painted on his shoe. That's not close to the most effective way for Kanter to use his platform but it sure is safe.I literally said he couldn't, in my post's CEO analogy. That doesn't make him blameless or immune from criticism, though, if you see him as a shill (as Kanter does).
Kanter needs to look down and see the shwoosh on his uni tonight. Hypocrite.Pretty much every player with a shoe deal in the league is a shill for a shoe company with similar labor practices to Nike. Something like 283 players besides LeBron shill for Nike. Their's this guy who is more famous than LeBron James who used to play and owns the Hornets who is more than a shill for Nike, he's a partner with them but MJ could probably make Kanter's life harder, just like going after Kanter's own teammates would. So, yeah he's totally justified in signalling one guy out and having a China's dictator crowning him, painted on his shoe. That's not close to the most effective way for Kanter to use his platform but it sure is safe.
Kanter needs to look down and see the shwoosh on his uni tonight. Hypocrite.
So you're okay with slavery in China? And okay with slave labor in China? We can't speak out against it?People need to dig deep on where they income originates is what I’m saying. If you’re cashing the checks, you have no place to speak. You wanna stand up, it’s going to be in the unemployment line.
People need to dig deep on where they income originates is what I’m saying. If you’re cashing the checks, you have no place to speak. You wanna stand up, it’s going to be in the unemployment line.
