Kanter?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

The short answer is that his defense really is that bad and he may be the one guy in the league LMA could beat in a "Ms Congeniality" contest. If even half the stories about him are true, he was the most hated guy in the Utah locker-room.
 
He's immature, so what? He's 23. Produce enough on the court and eventually people stop giving a shit. Look at Boogie.
 
The conventional wisdom is that LA's absence cripples this team. If Kanter's production is relatively similar, why wouldn't we want to bring him in to replace LA?
Like you, I haven't watched Kanter play enough to have an opinion on him. But if we accept that, offensively, he can replace LMA (and I do!) then I think it would have been fine to plug-n-play Kanter into LMA's slot. It's not LMA's absence that cripples the team - it's the fact that we no longer have Wes and Nic that cripples the team. Without adequate wings there's really no point (IMO) to adding another big man when we have 4 that need playing time to develop.
If the only change we made this summer was to replace LMA with Kanter (or Monroe) I think we would have been about the same as we were last year...maybe a bit better, but still not a contender. But once management decided not to take a chance on Wes, and then decided to ditch Nic, we lost all of our ability to be competitive for at least 1-2 years.
 
The fact that he still hasn't signed with Oklahoma must mean that he expects a large offer sheet from us, right? In another thread I saw someone mention Philly is the only other team that could offer him more than Oklahoma besides us, and they're packed at center or power forward.
 
Yeah, I get the feeling OKC is trying to bait us into offering him a big deal.
 
I'm having a tough time deciding if I want us to make a big offer to him. Good talent but does he fit? OKC has some salary issues coming up that the need to deal with. Durant and Waiters, Westbrook Adams... can they afford Kanter too?
 
If we want to be a competitive team, we gotta get him. I'd offer him the max then trade him if he doesn't work out.
 
The fact that he still hasn't signed with Oklahoma must mean that he expects a large offer sheet from us, right? In another thread I saw someone mention Philly is the only other team that could offer him more than Oklahoma besides us, and they're packed at center or power forward.
His QO is ~$7M. OKC would be wise to offer him $10M and tell him to bring them his best offer and they'll match.
 
FYI,

I saw a stat that Kanter gives up 66% FG in the paint. His defense is putrid.
 
FYI,

I saw a stat that Kanter gives up 66% FG in the paint. His defense is putrid.
Yeah I see his DRTg is 109.8!!!!! That is bad man, even if this is a "team oriented stat". His offensive rating is really high though.
 
He's 23, it's possible he will improve on defense. I can get behind a kanter-ed davis pairing. They compliment eachother well
 
Why did Utah get rid of him?
 
He's 23, it's possible he will improve on defense. I can get behind a kanter-ed davis pairing. They compliment eachother well
Don't get me wrong bro. I wouldn't be pissed if we got him. I'm just pointing out some really bad numbers. Is he just lazy on the defensive end? Wow?!?!
 
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/the-curious-case-of-enes-kanter/

One of the reasons for this, explained by Kennedy, includes Kanter’s comments about his former team, the Utah Jazz. But an even bigger concern for the Thunder than Kanter’s recent comments is his performance on the court.

Kanter, age 22, has put up nice per game statistics in his short time with the Thunder. Over his last 10 games, Kanter is averaging 21.3 points and 13.1 rebounds, while shooting 58.8 percent from the field. So what is the problem with the way Kanter is playing?

Kanter’s former Utah Jazz teammate Trevor Booker summed up the problem concisely after the Jazz beat the Thunder on March 28.

“He did what he always does: he got his stats, he didn’t defend, he took an L,” Booker said of Kanter, according to Tony Jones of the Salt Lake Tribune.

This was a bold and candid statement from Booker, but is exactly what the Thunder’s front-office needs to consider moving forward. On many nights, Kanter looks imposing and like a guy who deserves a lucrative deal. But look closer, and you can see the defensive limitations that puts a strain on his team’s overall defense. In 21 games played with the Thunder, Oklahoma City is scoring 108.1 points per 100 possessions, while surrendering 109.5 points with Kanter on the court, according to NBA.com. That comes out to a -1.4 net differential, which isn’t great, but isn’t terrible. However, consider that a 109.5 defensive rating would rank as the worst defensive rating in the entire league, including the last-place Minnesota Timberwolves. And things have only gotten worse recently.

Over the last 10 games, the Thunder are giving up 111.6 points per 100 possessionswith Kanter on the court, while scoring 107.1 points (-4.5 net). And it’s not as though Kanter is offsetting his lack of defensive impact with his offense. In that same span, when Kanter is off the court, the Thunder are scoring 110.8 points per 100 possessions.

Still not convinced that Kanter’s box score numbers blur his actual on court impact? Let’s take a look at the Jazz, who have become the league’s most dominant defensive team since trading Kanter. With Kanter, the Jazz scored 102.9 points per 100 possessions, while allowing opposing to teams to score 106.1 points, according to NBA.com. However, since trading Kanter, the Jazz have an offensive efficiency rating of 101.3 and a defensive efficiency rating of 93.2, good for an impressive +8.1 net rating.

To be fair to Kanter, being replaced by Rudy Gobert will make anyone look bad by comparison on the defensive end. That, and the Jazz collectively are showing signs of internal development and chemistry that were not there at the beginning of the season. But the numbers confirm what we can see with our eyes. Kanter is not a good rim protector, he isn’t very quick and he doesn’t have the foot speed to effectively defend the pick and roll (though he has improved his foot speed since losing weight). All of this is encapsulated in ESPN’s Real Plus-Minus metric (RPM), which ranks Kanter at 385thin the league (-3.28), due mostly to his abysmal -3.75 defensive RPM rating. To give more perspective, Kanter ranks dead last in defensive RPM among all qualified centers, including Andrea Bargnani of the New York Knicks.
 
His defense is worse, that's a given. But you can see the difference in their offense based on their stats, doesn't matter who says it.
 
Why did Utah get rid of him?

Good questions. All the reasons put forth as to why we should sign him apply to Utah. Between his defense and his unpopularity in the locker-room they decided to trade him rather than try to re-sign him. Draw your own conclusions.

Sorry. Thought you were being serious!
 
I'd wait until after using the MLE.

The Nets managed to go WAY over the apron the year they got KG from Boston.

It seems they can offer Smith $2.4M. He's either going to take it or not. He's still getting paid by Detroit, too.

The order is something like:

1) sign brewer to go from $60m to $68m, over the cap
2) use MLE
3) sign Beverly
4) sign Terry

At this point, they're over the apron. I think they can still sign their own FAs using exceptions.

Incorrect. The Nets used the tax payer MLE the year they got KG. They did not use the full MLE.
 
Something interesting i noticed:

LMA and Kanter stats at age 22:

LMA:__________ ppg: 17.8 FG%: 48.4% RPG:7.6 MPG:35
Kanter(OKC):_____ppg: 18.7 FG%: 56.6% RPG:11.0 MPG:31

Kanter(OKC+Utha):_ppg: 15.5 FG%: 52.85% RPG:8.9 MPG:29


Doesn't look so bad now, does it?
 
Something interesting i noticed:

LMA and Kanter stats at age 22:

LMA:__________ ppg: 17.8 FG%: 48.4% RPG:7.6 MPG:35
Kanter(OKC):_____ppg: 18.7 FG%: 56.6% RPG:11.0 MPG:31

Kanter(OKC+Utha):_ppg: 15.5 FG%: 52.85% RPG:8.9 MPG:29


Doesn't look so bad now, does it?
it is not about his offense, it's about defense for sure and perhaps an attitude issue - is this guy a team player or only worried about his offensive stats?
 
it is not about his offense, it's about defense for sure and perhaps an attitude issue - is this guy a team player or only worried about his offensive stats?
So, how is he different from Aldridge? :ghoti:
 
I remember Aldridge defense was ass in those years.
 
Last edited:
Something interesting i noticed:

LMA and Kanter stats at age 22:

LMA:__________ ppg: 17.8 FG%: 48.4% RPG:7.6 MPG:35
Kanter(OKC):_____ppg: 18.7 FG%: 56.6% RPG:11.0 MPG:31

Kanter(OKC+Utha):_ppg: 15.5 FG%: 52.85% RPG:8.9 MPG:29


Doesn't look so bad now, does it?
The issues I see with this kid is being a team player and defense. If he can be a semi average defender, then it's totally fine. If the locker room issues only were because he was in that shit hole Utah, then that's not a problem either.

I wouldn't be upset if we actually got this guy, but it could seriously backfire on us if the locker room issues are actually real. I'm not as worried about his defense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top