Blazers Roy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2015
- Messages
- 2,621
- Likes
- 2,909
- Points
- 113
No thanks. All offense no defense. I’d rather stick with Nurk.
I really like Nurk's game, but I rather have a player in uniform and not in a suit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No thanks. All offense no defense. I’d rather stick with Nurk.
I really like Nurk's game, but I rather have a player in uniform and not in a suit.
I really like Nurk's game, but I rather have a player in uniform and not in a suit.
Why would the Timberwolves trade a 24 year old star who is locked up for 4 years for CJ?I would assume CJ, Collins, and multiple 1st would have to be on the table to begin discussions.
FTFYI would try to get Robert Covington too. This team needs a big shake up. Unfortunately I don't think Neil has the assets to do it though.
Probably not... but maybe if you include Nurk. Dame, Towns, Whiteside trio is pretty intriguing.Why would the Timberwolves trade a 24 year old star who is locked up for 4 years for CJ?
Nurk has very little trade value while injured. I doubt a team like Minnesota would value him over expiring contracts, players on rookie deals, and picks.Probably not... but maybe if you include Nurk. Dame, Towns, Whiteside trio is pretty intriguing.
Think everyone is underselling how good KAT is. I believe he is the best offensive big in the league-- possibly ever. Seriously.As much as I don't like KAT's mindset, if the Blazers have a chance to acquire a player that gifted who would fit well with Dame then you absolutely have to take that risk.
KAT is one of the few possibly available players I'd give up Simons for. So expirings, any combo of the young guys, take on any unwanted salary from Minnesota, and add 3 1st round picks with little to no protection and hope that's enough to beat out other teams.
A core of Dame, CJ, Hood, KAT, and Nurk next year would be a pretty formidable lineup. I still don't see Minnesota giving up on him though.
Why would the Timberwolves trade a 24 year old star who is locked up for 4 years for CJ?
CJ, Whiteside and Collins for Towns and Covington?They probably would hate his salary, which is why they would probably want multiple picks, Collins, and Simons. Given his defensive short-comings, I don't see a trade that would be good for both sides happening.
Towns could also make Nurkic expendable.Towns could play with any of our big men. He's better than CJ McCollum.
If the goal is to be a championship contender, you have to get the best players you can.
Why would we want to make Nurkic expendable? Wouldn't it be better if KAT and Nurk formed a dominating big man duo?Towns could also make Nurkic expendable.
As much as I don't like KAT's mindset, if the Blazers have a chance to acquire a player that gifted who would fit well with Dame then you absolutely have to take that risk.
KAT is one of the few possibly available players I'd give up Simons for. So expirings, any combo of the young guys, take on any unwanted salary from Minnesota, and add 3 1st round picks with little to no protection and hope that's enough to beat out other teams.
A core of Dame, CJ, Hood, KAT, and Nurk next year would be a pretty formidable lineup. I still don't see Minnesota giving up on him though.
Fuck that this guy sucks and is overrated he can’t even lead a team to be the 8Th seed. Jimmy Butler gave them a taste of that and they almost fucked that up when jimmy missed the last month of the season. Other than that KAT never once made the playoffs.
There’s a reason Butler bailed on them quickly and destroyed them with bench guys during that infamous scrimmage
Hood will be fine as a role player going forward. He didn't rely on quickness or lateral movement to be effective, just length. Plus even without an Achilles anyone can just stand in the corner and shoot 3's like our offense makes the forwards do. Our defense is a bunch of people standing around as well so he'll fit right back in!Sucks, but Hood shouldn't be part of any future roster plans. Likely his injury is career ending.
Why would we want to make Nurkic expendable? Wouldn't it be better if KAT and Nurk formed a dominating big man duo?
Because his injuries with Portland aren't structural they are broken bones which in most cases don't prevent athletes from regaining previous athleticism and strength. If you want to think that Hood won't be the same again then fine, I get your point but there is nothing that will prevent Nurk from eventually being himself again. Both of his injuries with Portland also took place towards the end of the season so the timing was bad. Would you not want Paul George on our team because he has been injured a few times?I really don't get why all of you are so optimistic about Nurk's part in the Blazers' future, he has already missed 2 out of 3 postseasons.
I LOVE his game, but Centers (and even point guards) are replaceable nowadays. Being young & talented at the Forward\SG spots is more important.
The idea of KAT and Nurk forming a dominating big man duo is fantasy. It's not happening. Why didn't Denver form a big man duo of Nurkic and Jokic? I'm sure some fans had that on there mind too.Why would we want to make Nurkic expendable? Wouldn't it be better if?
You don't see an appreciable difference between Jokic's game and KAT's?The idea of KAT and Nurk forming a dominating big man duo is fantasy. It's not happening. Why didn't Denver form a big man duo of Nurkic and Jokic? I'm sure some fans had that on there mind too.
KAT can play PF, Nurk and Jokic can't. It's that simple. In fact I think KAT would be better as a PF playing next to a legit center (think Aldridge-esque).The idea of KAT and Nurk forming a dominating big man duo is fantasy. It's not happening. Why didn't Denver form a big man duo of Nurkic and Jokic? I'm sure some fans had that on there mind too.
Nurk has very little trade value while injured. I doubt a team like Minnesota would value him over expiring contracts, players on rookie deals, and picks.
And Porzingis was on his rookie deal still at the time which is why I put in my post "players on rookie deals."Porzingas had good value while he was injured. With Nurkic close to being recovered i would think he still has pretty good value as he is young and on a very favorable contract.
Because his injuries with Portland aren't structural they are broken bones which in most cases don't prevent athletes from regaining previous athleticism and strength. If you want to think that Hood won't be the same again then fine, I get your point but there is nothing that will prevent Nurk from eventually being himself again. Both of his injuries with Portland also took place towards the end of the season so the timing was bad. Would you not want Paul George on our team because he has been injured a few times?
