Politics Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing, now with New allegations! (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Will Kavanaugh be confirmed?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Burn it all down

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
barfo said:


Subtle he's not.

barfo
Click to expand...


Dn08rLvXcAEC8bN.jpg
 
Bitches include liberals too I guess. Not just women.
 
I have no idea if there’s enough corroboration for this new allegation to hold up. If it happened, I hope like hell there is. Either way, I would bet that they are burning the midnight oil at the White House looking for a new nominee. I’d recommend going with a woman at this point.
 
e_blazer said:
I have no idea if there’s enough corroboration for this new allegation to hold up. If it happened, I hope like hell there is. Either way, I would bet that they are burning the midnight oil at the White House looking for a new nominee. I’d recommend going with a woman at this point.
Click to expand...

There is a woman, but she's catholic so similar tactics will be used.
 
Senior Republican staffers also learned of the allegation last week and, in conversations with The New Yorker, expressed concern about its potential impact on Kavanaugh’s nomination. Soon after, Senate Republicans issued renewed calls to accelerate the timing of a committee vote.
Click to expand...

Quick, let's get him confirmed to a lifetime appointment before we find out anything else about him!

barfo
 
Its clear that Ford doesnt want to testify.

She agreed go reluctantly because Grassley put a deadline and a vote was taking place on Monday, now this comes out conveniently and the left will use it to try to prevent Ford from testifing next week.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/23/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-testify.html

In a statement, Judge Kavanaugh denied the allegation from the woman, Deborah Ramirez, and called it “a smear, plain and simple.” The New Yorker did not confirm with other eyewitnesses that Judge Kavanaugh was at the party.

The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.
Click to expand...
 
EL PRESIDENTE said:
Click to expand...


Maybe there was another student at Yale who looked just like Kavanaugh! Maybe a map of the dorm rooms of all involved would be helpful.

barfo
 
barfo said:
Maybe there was another student at Yale who looked just like Kavanaugh! Maybe a map of the dorm rooms of all involved would be helpful.

barfo
Click to expand...

A credible accuser, corroboration or any evidence whatsoever would be fantastic if you really want to railroad this nominee.
 
MarAzul said:
No I do not think she should be bullied. I think she should be sued for slander and irreparable damages.

She can not prove these damaging allegations, so there must be a price to pay for the thrill.
Click to expand...

Why do you say things like this? You can't possibly believe it is a conspiracy hatched in family therapy in 2012? Or that she shouldn't have the right to bring this information forward? Or that it is not pertinent? Or that behavior like that should be permissible?

No. You are a father of a daughter. You understand. You are kidding and I'm an idiot for not realizing it. I'm going with this. Good one.
 
EL PRESIDENTE said:
A credible accuser, corroboration or any evidence whatsoever would be fantastic if you really want to railroad this nominee.
Click to expand...

I predict your defense of the "Bro Judge" is going to get harder and harder over the next couple of days.

barfo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top