Keep Lillard, McCollum, Plumlee and Crabbe.

[Chris Craig]

Harkless is tradeable. We have picks but I'd rather keep them unless we're getting a long term guy (Noel, Nurkic, etc)

Crabbe will probably end up getting traded and I'm going to hate it, but whatever.

Leonard, Davis, and Ezeli are probably gone as well

We can only hope that someone will take Meyers. Can we trade Ezeli, him being injured and all...isnt there a rule that nixes trading injured players?

In all likelihood it will be Crabbe, and or a pick/sidepiece for Noel and a sidepiece

 

[Scalma]

Crabbe is shooting over 50% from three since end of November. 44% on the season.

(I'm just mentally preparing myself for when we trade him, as well as laughing at the group that think he doesn't have value because of his contract)

 

[theprunetang]

I was looking at Instagram and saw that a good friend of mine had this quality burn.

 

[Hobbesarable]

I'm confused. So, "Blow it up, but don't blow it up?"

Or "Our garbage is another person's treasure."

 

[Boob-No-More]

Crabbe is shooting over 50% from three since end of November. 44% on the season.

(I'm just mentally preparing myself for when we trade him, as well as laughing at the group that think he doesn't have value because of his contract)

Of course he has value. That's the point. That's why he gets mentioned in possible trade scenarios. You have to give up something to get something.

We're overloaded with guys who can play the 2 and 3 spots, but have the worst front court in the league. Moving a player like Crabbe, who others teams value, and may even consider started quality, to address our weaknesses makes a hell of a lot of sense.

Nobody talks about trading Patty Baseball because we wouldn't get anything of significant value in return. The fact that Crabbe gets mentioned in so many trade scenarios means, by definition, the posters in this forum think he has value - enough value to get us a significant upgrade that addresses our front court deficiencies.

BNM

 

[Cippy91]

Of course he has value. That's the point. That's why he gets mentioned in possible trade scenarios. You have to give up something to get something.

We're overloaded with guys who can play the 2 and 3 spots, but have the worst front court in the league. Moving a player like Crabbe, who others teams value, and may even consider started quality, to address our weaknesses makes a hell of a lot of sense.

Nobody talks about trading Patty Baseball because we wouldn't get anything of significant value in return. The fact that Crabbe gets mentioned in so many trade scenarios means, by definition, the posters in this forum think he has value - enough value to get us a significant upgrade that addresses our front court deficiencies.

BNM

THIS. People would rather address trading dame and cj then look at the roster for what it is. From the beginning we have needed to address the frontcourt which is why we got ezeli but we know how that story ends. Time to go out and get a rim protector. Robin Lopez was great for us and he was and is a slow center. Think about what Noel could do on both ends with dame and cj being the guards