ABM
Happily Married In Music City, USA!
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2008
- Messages
- 31,865
- Likes
- 5,785
- Points
- 113
It'll be weird when KP calls representing another team to offer a trade.
Pritchslap that little Ferry!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It'll be weird when KP calls representing another team to offer a trade.
It'll be weird when KP calls representing another team to offer a trade.
Paul Allen doesn't stay up at night worrying about it. He publicly shuns people and strings out their firing when he gets his feelings hurt.
I think he's sincere too. Thus my vote for #3.
barfo
quite possibly both are. There may be no way for Allen to reveal the reasons he chose to part ways with Pritchard without it reflecting badly on KP so he's staying mum on the subject and looking like the bad guy for firing a popular figure. He may be allowing KP to save face publicly. I'd imagine Pritchard is well aware of why he's been let go and is also choosing not reveal the details and to defend and compliment his former boss.I have to wonder, who's taking the high-road here -- KP or PA?
Very gracious of him to back PA. Yes Paul could of handled it better, but none the less the fans (fueled by the media) are getting a little too emotional about this and are jumping to conclusions. Thanks KP, you are a Class Act.
It's been repeatedly stated that this was a buildup of things, not one thing.
You are avoiding the question. You say Paul is the bad guy. KP says Paul is not the bad guy. How do you reconcile those two viewpoints? Is KP not telling the truth?
barfo
quite possibly both are. There may be no way for Allen to reveal the reasons he chose to part ways with Pritchard without it reflecting badly on him so he's staying mum on the subject and looking like the bad guy for firing a popular figure. I'd imagine Pritchard is well aware of why he's been let go and is obviously choosing also not reveal the details and to defend and compliment his former boss.
STOMP
Why does my opinion have to be in concert with Pritchard's opinion? That's some binary thinking.
That's what happens when you fire a popular person without giving a reason.
There would be no jumping anywhere if the reasons were made clear.
PA has nobody but to blame but himself for the conclusions being drawn.
It doesn't. You can say that Pritchard is full of shit on that point, if you want. One of you is, however, because both viewpoints can't be true.
barfo
How I perceive a situation is how I perceive a situation..
Based upon limited, if any, knowledge of the situation, though.
Differing opinions can both be true. How I perceive a situation is how I perceive a situation. As I said, binary thinking.
That's why it's an opinion. I do know that Paul Allen treated Pritchard like shit by publicly humiliating him with the seating situation, though, which forms part of my opinion.
Can we have Paul Allen's open letter to Trail Blazers fans?
Larry Miller has just sent a threatening letter out to other owners essentially relating if they hire KP within one year there will be pure hell to pay.
Sure, you can perceive that 2+2=359, and I can perceive that 2+2=4. But it isn't the case that both are true.
barfo
That's because one is a fact, and one is an error. Opinions aren't like that, but whatever.
Right. Some things are merely opinions, and some things are facts.
What happened to get KP fired is a matter of fact, not opinion. We don't know the facts, but that doesn't mean that it is a matter of opinion.
barfo
No, the fact is that Pritchard was fired. I'm sure many in the organization have differing opinions on why that happened, let alone those of us outside of the team. Binary.
I love you Barfo.

