Kidd or Miller

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Who would you rather SIGN!?

  • Jason Kidd

    Votes: 30 54.5%
  • Andre Miller

    Votes: 25 45.5%

  • Total voters
    55
For a year, maybe two - there is a good chance that Kidd would be a slight upgrade over Kirk - if we assume that Kirk has permanently declined from his all-NBA defensive team years. However, if there is a chance that Kirk, playing his natural position and not wounded will regain his defensive acumen - he will be a better player than Kidd. Add the fact that if the new PG experiment actually works - Kirk would be a long-term solution - and I would go with Kirk over Kidd.

See how on the fence I am. You just changed my mind back to Hinrich again ... I think? :wink:
 
One thing you have to take into account is who these three guys actually guarded.

Last season, Kidd was almost exclusively used to cover the SG. Hinrich goes back-and forth. Miller defends PGs. Seems to me, the latter is what we need!
 
One thing you have to take into account is who these three guys actually guarded.

Last season, Kidd was almost exclusively used to cover the SG. Hinrich goes back-and forth. Miller defends PGs. Seems to me, the latter is what we need!

Good point, a Kidd/Roy backcourt would have a lot of trouble on d against the speedster 1's.
 
One thing you have to take into account is who these three guys actually guarded.

Last season, Kidd was almost exclusively used to cover the SG. Hinrich goes back-and forth. Miller defends PGs. Seems to me, the latter is what we need!

I would suggest that you look at Hinrich's production by position and see his offense/defense net gain on the PG position. It is eye opening how efficient he was playing that position. Was it because he only played it against backup PG's? I do not know - but - let's remember that when he played the position with the 2nd unit - their offense was nowhere as efficient - so, overall - his +10.2 vs. Blake's +8.6 playing with better offensive play-mates and on a better defensive team - is quite impressive.

Andre Miller - on the other hand, has a +1.8 rating playing the PG position - honestly, I am just not a fan, I think some of this Miller-lust is a case of the lawn being greener elsewhere.

Kidd's +5.3 probably shows us how much he declined defensively...
 
I'm more intrigued with Kidd. I think he'd have the respect of the younger guys, and would be a good influence on Jerryd like what was said already. No way I'd give him a four-year contract but a two-, or at most three, wouldn't be that bad..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top