- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 127,308
- Likes
- 147,820
- Points
- 115
@kjironman1 what makes you think I said negative stuff last night about Lillard? Sick of your shit. Get your facts straight
LOL!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I always liked what he wrote also. "Behind the Locker Room Door" was one of a kind. He also knew more about BRoy than anybody. But in the end some players lost trust in him. Can he get it back? I somehow think not. Might be best for him to try greener pastures?
And then we have the Pippen issues....
Then there were the Batum issues....
Then there were the Oden issues....
Then there are the Aldridge issues....
Are there going to be Lillard issues?
True...Very True.In hindsight, all of those issues proved out for the most part.
I really enjoyed the Behind the Locker Room Door series.
It's hard to separate Quick from Canzano, and I try because Canzano is far worse, but they both are creatures of the same cowardly anonymous Editor who hates the Blazers. The paper is losing money hand over fist now, while the Blazers have easily moved ahead without its support.
I like Quick, have never had a problem with the things he writes.
It's funny, he's written things that Blazer fans don't like so they don't believe it but in the end he was right. His Duck coverage was the same. People lost their minds when he first started talking about Colt Lyerla but he was right.
Quick left the Oregonian last year.
Honestly I've never understood the people that shit themselves over what the writers put out. It's their jobs to put out material people talk about..... It's comes off as very childish and whiny to bitch about the paper.
Unless is Clownzano... Then it's warranted.Honestly I've never understood the people that shit themselves over what the writers put out. It's their jobs to put out material people talk about..... It's comes off as very childish and whiny to bitch about the paper.
Sure. But those people have NOTHING to do with Damian Lillard. Even if there are Damian "issues" at some point in the future, any issues with those other people will have had nothing to do with it. Why bring it up? Judge Dame on Dame, not someone else.In hindsight, all of those issues proved out for the most part.
Nope. No connection. The paper is what it is. They want to get you talking about them and they will write whatever the highest bidder wants them to. That's who they are. Whining about it doesnt change it.Wow. This is contrary to everything written on this board for many years. Okay, you oppose all criticism of the news media. They should write whatever lies they want. They should practically replace the government, religion, and economic system. The media should be our masters. Finding wrong with the media = being whiny. Sure. You must have a connection.
Sure. But those people have NOTHING to do with Damian Lillard. Even if there are Damian "issues" at some point in the future, any issues with those other people have nothing to do with it. Why bring it up? Judge Dame on Dame, not someone else.
I know. Same here.I wasn't referring to Dame but to those players before in that list and that for the most part, in hindsight, it had all come out about the way it had been written about. And I didn't bring that up, someone else posted that list of players.

