Knicks open to trading Tyson Chandler, Blazers Interested (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Probably Asik. I don't like either's attitude, but I don't trust Chandler to play the amount and duration that he'd need to to make up for the amount of players we have to send out just to make salaries match. And maybe Asik can snap out of his displeasure with being stuck behind Howard and not being able to play the 4.

In all honesty, I'm not horrified by the troika of Freeland/Leonard/Robinson backing up our bigs.
 
BrianFromWA said:
Probably Asik. I don't like either's attitude, but I don't trust Chandler to play the amount and duration that he'd need to to make up for the amount of players we have to send out just to make salaries match. And maybe Asik can snap out of his displeasure with being stuck behind Howard and not being able to play the 4.

In all honesty, I'm not horrified by the troika of Freeland/Leonard/Robinson backing up our bigs.
Click to expand...

I agree. I like the combination of Freeland and Robinson, but I cringe every time I see Leonard on the defensive side of the floor.
 
rasheedfan2005 said:
I'll trust our genius gm. I mean I hate Chandler and I love our chemistry but there is no denying he can defend and could probably be Lopez plus.
Click to expand...

Blazers had great chemistry Back in the late 80s- early 90s and what did that get them?
 
I don't see that we have the pieces. Also, I worry about rocking the chemistry boat. I think this team's success is based on its chemistry more than its talent.

I think Chandler would be a nice player for us, and Stotts certainly knows him well, but I'm cautious about messing with our team.
 
...
416755424_640.jpg
 
yuyuza1 said:
Felt that was too much youth to give up for Chandler. I kinda wanna hold on to at least one of TRob/Meyers.
Click to expand...

If we wanted to add a shit-ton of defense (this would be high risk)

Mo/Wright/Freeland/Leonard/Barton

for

Chandler/Shumpert/Udrih

It would be a chemistry gamble certainly. But adds a lot of defense/athleticism. We would really need to believe in Chandler's health and CJ's ability to play the Mo role now. Also, it might put us in a position to give Claver some minutes at backup 3/4, not sure if we trust him now.
 
Chandler would be a great pickup but he's so damned expensive that I would not gut the bench to acquire him at this point. He didn't have an impact against us last time we beat them in NY when he played a full game.
 
riverman said:
Terry Stotts would argue this point. We don't run the 7 sec offense under Stotts and never have.
Click to expand...

If you say so. The 109 PPG and bottom 1/3 defense is D'Antoni- like.
 
I highly doubt Wilt or Bill Russel would have predicted Luc Longley, Will Perdue and Bill Wennington could be the centers on a multi championship Bulls team either but they were.
 
Why would there be any hesitation to trade a collection of players off our bench (except CJ) for Tyson? It would be a huge upgrade for Portland. It would make them legit contenders.
 
Last edited:
Sinobas said:
Why would there be any hesitation to trade a collection of players off our bench (except CJ) for Tyson? It would be a huge upgrade for Portland.
Click to expand...

It might be, or it might have been 3 years ago...Chandler has been losing since NY and his big payday..he plays with a superstar, can't stay healthy and costs a ton of money. I like the idea of having a defender like he was in Dallas. Since he's been a Knick, he's slacked off from what I've seen. Recently he's had some good games but would you give up that many guys for him? He's been very injury prone and missed games due to illness quite a bit this season and last season. We have a relatively healthy team. I'm getting used to it but beyond my jaded opinions, Olshey know what to do. Trust Olshey I say!
 
Sinobas said:
Why would there be any hesitation to trade a collection of players off our bench (except CJ) for Tyson? It would be a huge upgrade for Portland. It would make them legit contenders.
Click to expand...

I like CJ but he's a project, He has not won or contributed to our win column like Freeland or Robinson or Williams have this season. I think those guys deserve some respect and the rookie has not shown that much yet.
 
If you can get him on the cheap (no CJ) but had to take back JR Smith, would you do it?
 
riverman said:
I like CJ but he's a project, He has not won or contributed to our win column like Freeland or Robinson or Williams have this season. I think those guys deserve some respect and the rookie has not shown that much yet.
Click to expand...
?? He came back like 1 week ago.
 
riverman said:
I like CJ but he's a project, He has not won or contributed to our win column like Freeland or Robinson or Williams have this season. I think those guys deserve some respect and the rookie has not shown that much yet.
Click to expand...

Sorry, just had to log in and let my laugh out....Okay, that's all. Much need on a slow night.
 
Cost + production = not a great value and makes it tough for me to pony up what it would take $$$ wise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

truebluefan
Knicks open to trading Julius Randle amid frustrating season
Replies
0
Views
823
truebluefan
truebluefan
BigGameDamian
Notice 16 players the Portland Trail Blazers should consider trading for
2 3
Replies
67
Views
6K
Mr. Robot
Mr. Robot
knicks235
spree to spurs rumor still alive
Replies
2
Views
2K
Kid Canada
Kid Canada
SlyPokerDog
The Ringer: Is It Time to Break Up the Blazers?
Replies
22
Views
1K
KingSpeed
KingSpeed
ABM
Trail Blazers Offseason Preview, Part I: Trade Possibilities (Bleacher Report)
Replies
15
Views
1K
BrianFromWA
BrianFromWA

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top