<div class="quote_poster">Chutney Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">He's generalizing, but there are similarities. Both players were stuck in crappy situations (VC's was actually worse than Kobe's). Both players have the same somewhat-selfish goal (go somewhere where they can win), but they went about achieving that goal in different ways (VC halfassed his way to NJ, Kobe's PMS'ing on every media outlet he can find). The biggest difference, in my opinion, is that Kobe's done about as much as he can possibly do to make the team better. Carter never dedicated himself to improvement like Kobe did and he never even tried to be a leader like Kobe has.</div>
Quoted for truth
Anyways, I don't understand why Lakers fans were so hyped about Kidd though, he really wouldn't improve the team as much as people seem to think he would, especially if they're running the triangle. Look, I think Kidd is great, he's a great passer, great rebounding guard (though I think the Lakers are fine on the glass), but he's not giving them consistent shooting or scoring to support Kobe, and his defense is not what it was back in the day.
I think it would be one of those get hyped early on, then start hating on Kidd later on that he can't do this or that and isn't helping Kobe.