Blazinaway
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 11,085
- Likes
- 4,374
- Points
- 113
I will take it. Hoping it is for the vet min to preserve cap space.
if it's two yrs it should be vet's min
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I will take it. Hoping it is for the vet min to preserve cap space.
Just want to make sure I get this straight...
Right now, if we had to play today, our starting 4 and 5 would be Kurt Thomas and Marcus Camby? Unless Chris Johnson beats one of them out?
Blazermaniacs deserve some good news
Why the fuck is this guy getting two years? Portland has an opportunity to have significant cap space next season and uses some of it on Kurt fucking Thomas?
it it's vet min near 1 mil then it's not a big deal, still hope it's a team option for 2nd
No excuse for Nate not to run with that group..............
This is a very solid signing. Compared with $10M a year for DeAndre Jordan (the Clippers matched! Now they're still stupid but they spend money!), it's fucking genius. Yes he's old, and yes his PER isn't great, but the Bulls won like crazy with him and he's a great team player. Plus he's got those psycho eyes.
Is he going to help us win a title? If not it's a bad signing if it takes a cent from next years cap space
Is he going to help us win a title? If not it's a bad signing if it takes a cent from next years cap space
was there any signing that would help them win a title?
No, that's my point. Why trwo years
is the vet min required to be a certain length?
I disagree. Not tear down but retool. We can't tear down considering we have LA and Batum. One good draft and a few trades/signings we will be fine. Would you like to relive the 2004-2005 days maxiep?
Is he going to help us win a title? If not it's a bad signing if it takes a cent from next years cap space
