If we didn't apply for the Disabled Player Exception on Ezeli by the 15th, I'd have to ask why? Even if we weren't specifically targeting Sanders, it would make sense to get the exception and possibly use it on someone else.
I believe you can still trade the disabled player after receiving the exception, and I know you can still play that player if he recovers from his injury in unexpected fashion. The player you acquire, either via free agent signing or via trade, can make up to half of Ezeli's salary + $100,000, but must be in the final year of his contact, with no options for additional years.
This is the part of the wording of the Disabled Player Exception that gives me pause:
"This exception is granted by the league, based on an application from the team and a determination by an NBA-designated physician that the player is substantially more likely than not to be unable to play through the following June 15."
So, what the fuck is actually going on with Ezeli? Is he likely to return? If so, when? Is he not likely to return? If not, why not apply for the Disabled Player Exception? Does Neil not think an independent physician would determine "that the player is substantially more likely than not to be unable to play through the following June 15."? Why not at least apply for the exception and see?
Given the help this team needs, and the salary cap and luxury tax situation, I would think Neil would want to explore every possible option to get us some much needed help. Applying for the Disabled Player Exception has no negative consequences. Worst case you get denied, and you're in the same situation as if you didn't apply. The middle ground is you're granted the exception, but can't find a suitable player to add to the roster by March 10 (when the exception expires). Best case, you pick up a player that actually helps the team.
Who knows, maybe Neil applied for the exception and we just haven't heard anything about it.
BNM