OT LeBron James said Kyle Rittenhouse should 'knock it off' after the teen cried during murder trial

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
calvin natt said:
Why do we have police? I mean, you can carry their gun, walk down any street, any state, “defend” anyones property, and when you make someone angry, just kill them. Go home, move on. Easy peasy.
Click to expand...

calvin natt said:
Huh

I’m saying he believes the jury has spoken and that’s the end. As do I. Case closed. Doesn’t mean I like it. Get off your high horse Jesus
Click to expand...

moved on quite a ways i see….

i see it because im up on that high horse. Lol.
 
ehizzy3 said:



should that video have been allowed in court?
Click to expand...


Yes.

It goes to show his character

It's relevant. It should have been allowed

But his buddy the Judge wasn't about to let that happen.
 
ehizzy3 said:


should that video have been allowed in court?
Click to expand...


Eh... Video just shows kids will say stuff. Ive heard lots of kids say they'd shoot people, or kill people, or kill themselves... They are infinitely more likely not to follow through with it than to do it...

Most kids say something like that at one point or another and it doesn't change the facts of the case.
 








 
Phatguysrule said:
Eh... Video just shows kids will say stuff. Ive heard lots of kids say they'd shoot people, or kill people, or kill themselves... They are infinitely more likely not to follow through with it than to do it...

Most kids say something like that at one point or another and it doesn't change the facts of the case.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but he actually went and shot people. But, hey kids will be kids
 
Phatguysrule said:
Eh... Video just shows kids will say stuff. Ive heard lots of kids say they'd shoot people, or kill people, or kill themselves... They are infinitely more likely not to follow through with it than to do it...

Most kids say something like that at one point or another and it doesn't change the facts of the case.
Click to expand...
I assure you I said some stupid things in my teens but never that.
 
Chris Craig said:








Click to expand...

There should be evidence of the testimony at Julius Jones' trial. If he had an alibi that wasn't heard then he should get a retrial.

And if the alibi is the most concrete evidence he should be freed and be made financially whole.

Absolutely.
 
crandc said:
I assure you I said some stupid things in my teens but never that.
Click to expand...

So, after a teenager says they'd harm somebody, how often do you think that actually leads to them doing it within weeks? What percent of threats do you think are followed through with?

I'm guessing less than 5%... Maybe less than 1%...
 
Yeah im out for a bit. This place is gonan get even so polarizing because of the inability for some to have a conversatio with someone they dont agree with.
But yet make snide comments on a daily basis…


Fricken lunatics gonna run rampant this weekend and its no different in S2.

Have fun cutting each other down over opinions. Done with that shit. Lol.
 
calvin natt said:
I’m not sure you’re making the point you think you are unsurprisingly
Click to expand...

oh my point was made just fine for those with enough self observation to get it.
Apparently you are not one of those people.
Have fun continuing your rants that you moved on from.
Not wasting my time with such hypocrisy anymore.
Have at it man…
 
F32F17CD-F7BF-4CC8-9671-0EAA5031E992.jpeg
Orion Bailey said:
oh my point was made just fine for those with enough self observation to get it.
Apparently you are not one of those people.
Have fun continuing your rants that you moved on from.
Not wasting my time with such hypocrisy anymore.
Have at it man…
Click to expand...
 
Phatguysrule said:
So, after a teenager says they'd harm somebody, how often do you think that actually leads to them doing it within weeks? What percent of threats do you think are followed through with?

I'm guessing less than 5%... Maybe less than 1%...
Click to expand...

And that's why it should have been included as evidence
 
Chris Craig said:
And that's why it should have been included as evidence
Click to expand...
Why? If there is no correlation or causation it can only serve to introduce bias.

I'm not 100% opposed to it being introduced as evidence, but I also see the argument against it.

*Edit* Eh... Still... I don't see how it helps anything. It doesn't change the fact that he was being attacked when he fired the first shot.

Everything after that was just unfortunate. And I think everybody involved has had their lives destroyed enough to not want to go through it again.
 
Phatguysrule said:
Why? If there is no correlation or causation it can only serve to introduce bias.

I'm not 100% opposed to it being introduced as evidence, but I also see the argument against it.

*Edit* Eh... Still... I don't see how it helps anything. It doesn't change the fact that he was being attacked when he fired the first shot.

Everything after that was just unfortunate. And I think everybody involved has had their lives destroyed enough to not want to go through it again.
Click to expand...

Well hopefully he doesn't walk around with an assault rifle anymore
 
Got a call from my son warning me to avoid social media. Apparently, the wingnut fever swamp is already openly crowing about now having a license to hunt lefties. SMH. Nothing good is going to come from this verdict.
 
Buffalo Custard said:
Got a call from my son warning me to avoid social media. Apparently, the wingnut fever swamp is already openly crowing about now having a license to hunt lefties. SMH. Nothing good is going to come from this verdict.
Click to expand...

This is what I was talking about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top