Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are a few options:Where should he logically go instead?
New York - If he wants to revitalize a historic franchise, biggest market in America, MSG, they have the most cap room in the league
Many people from all around the country think he's going to the Knicks because the Knicks have been cleaning house for like the past 3 seasons just for Lebron. Not to mention, they have absolutely no clue about the Nets, and figure they can't offer Lebron anything close to what the Knicks can.
You are wrong, my friend. People - usually not Knicks fans - assume that we're cleaning house for LeBron. Our 2010 plan is much bigger than LeBron, though he is the "prize". Walsh and everyone realizes that the chances of signing LeBron are slim. However, you neglected to mention that this is arguably the best free agency period in NBA history. Wade, Bosh, Joe Johnson, Boozer, Amar'e, Gay, etc. are also available.
People are very much aware of the Nets situation: They lost 70 games last season, and have an uncertain head coach situation.
So if the Knicks sign a combination of Wade/Bosh or Boozer/Lee/Joe Johnson it will be a complete failure? When has Walsh given any indication that the plan was only for LeBron? I think you have been duped by the media. LeBron is not the only reason why this is arguably the best free agency class in NBA history. Of course the Knicks, like the other 29 teams in the NBA, want LeBron, but the 2010 plan isn't LeBron or bust; there are plenty of other free agents who can help turn this team around.Oh please. The plan was always Lebron. Anything else is failure.
I disagree strongly. LeBron has said that he wants to win so why would he go to a 70-loss team? Only two teams in NBA history have had worst records than these Nets. Further, you mention that they have a nice young roster, but there are teams like the Bulls and Clippers that have better young talent. They also don't have John Wall as of now, and there is a 75% chance that they don't land Wall, so he's far from a certainty.That proves that they know nothing. The Nets have a nice young roster, and the ability to improve even more if they get Wall.
The coaching situation does matter. A coach like D'Antoni, for example, is liked by several players (including James and Wade) in this league and no doubt that can influence a player's decision to sign with a team. If you believe Avery is a "control freak" and the Nets sign him, will that not have an influence on whether a player will sign?Coaching situation? Hardly matters. The Nets finally have an owner who is willing to spend money on the Nets so they can be winners. Prokhorov is going to spend money on the right coach and players. He's the type of owner every team would like.
I'm not saying the Nets will get Lebron, but you act like they're non contenders.
Yeah, Joe definitely isn't getting a max, especially after he stunk up the playoffs. But that's a good thing so we can get him much cheaper. You think like $11M will do it?The Nets do have a cool owner.
Mr. J, you don't want Joe Johnson for that kind of money. You're better off with Bosh/etc.
Yeah, Joe definitely isn't getting a max, especially after he stunk up the playoffs. But that's a good thing so we can get him much cheaper. You think like $11M will do it?
Read more: http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archi..._lebron_is_leaning_toward_nets/#ixzz0rynJ8OIlAn NBA player told Alan Hahn of Newsday that LeBron James' top choice is to sign with the Nets.
The player urged Hahn to "be the first reporter to start writing the Nets as the team he's most likely to go [to], because that's what it's sounding like."
On Saturday, Frank Isola reported that his sources believe that New York is James' preferred destination should he leave Cleveland.