Pinwheel1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 23,418
- Likes
- 15,983
- Points
- 113
Yes. Batum is THAT MUCH BETTER than Crabbe. And Batum would be even better than he was, production and consistency wise, if we don't need him to feed the post. Batum can and will play whatever role he is assigned. My only apprehension with bringing back Batum, is that with Dame and CJ controlling the ball and taking all the shots, Batum may again find himself out of a scoring role and criticized for being "inconsistent".
That in a nutshell was my whole point. If you take away what he does best, and even at that it was not that great, then you are left with a 3 and D guy who is shooting 35% from deep this year. up from last year. Which is worse than Crabbe....
