Let The Pu$$y Grabbing Commence!!

[Jade Falcon]

View attachment 11911

LMAO, is that Kaman?

 

[riverman]

Sounds like you waited to closing time and were the last to hook up.

I don't miss those days that's for sure

 

[riverman]

LMAO, is that Kaman?

yep...the D'Anotoni Kaman Laker hate fest

 

[Denny Crane]

I'm sorry @Denny Crane but that just has to be the silliest post I've ever seen you post.

It's true.

We used to have to spend a good chunk of everyone's time gathering energy. Almost all the energy on earth back then was solar.

There is no sun at night, the wind doesn't blow all the time. You're going to need to read by candle at night without a 24/7 and cheap energy source.

Progress, my ass.

 

[Denny Crane]

Who gives a shit? That dude was a grown ass man when he said that. You believe he thinks anything different?

I'm more concerned about his recent history than something he said many years ago.

 

[MarAzul]

We used to have to spend a good chunk of everyone's time gathering energy

I still do.

 

[H.C.]

Burgerville has a pretty damn good breakfast. Overeasy eggs cooked as ordered. Hash browns crispy, not greasy. Ham not fatty. And they actually give you the strawberry jam for the english muffin instead of that weird mixed jelly thing.

Good deal for $4.79. Kicks the shit out of McDonald's breakfast.

I used to order one of their salads.
Then I got food poisoning from it and I'll never eat there again.
Sad too, one of the few fast food places I would actually eat at.

 

[Denny Crane]

It's not about party affiliation it's about worldview. Eisenhower was a progressive Republican. I wish we had more Eisenhowers right now. He's probably rolling in his grave looking at these motherfuckers in Washington capitulate to their corporate Masters and the military industrial complex... Shameful...

Democrats ripped on Ike like they do on Trump. They treated him like he was Dan Quayle or W.

Like W, he was elected to a 2nd term.

 

[PtldPlatypus]

It means you're not accepting of things you can't change. Normal things. It's normal to be gay just like it is to be Hetero.

The "Normalcy" of homosexual relations isn't something factual. It's subjective, and therefore an opinion. I have mine, and you have yours, which I accept as your opinion, but not fact. That doesn't make me intolerant.

The moment people understand this and stop thinking about gay sex is the moment when acceptance will begin to occur.

See here's the thing about gay people everybody talks about the sex. There was a Christian website that every time they spoke about Tyson Gay the Sprinter the auto filter turned his last name into homosexual. What that says to me, especially since you always hear the term homosexual and not gay from conservatives, is that too many people are concentrated on gay sex. They never concentrate on the love that those two Souls have for one another. Those two are in love.

I can't speak for anyone else, but based on my reading of the Bible, homosexual sex is the only aspect of homosexuality which is considered sinful. I'm fact, I've had this discussion with my wife before. She actually considers me frustratingly liberal because I think that gay person could be in a long term relationship homosexual relationship and be well within the bounds of God's morality if said relationship is asexual.

So, if God is love, and you do not know love unless you know God, how is the love between them explained? If God doesn't make mistakes then that means he created gay people because they are born that way not made.

Actually, you're mis-paraphrasing that verse. 1 John doesn't say you can't love if you don't know God: it says that if you don't love, you don't know God. That's an important distinction. All humans are made in God's image, so all are capable of love. Also, it's important not to conflate "Eros" (romantic) love with "agape" (Godly sacrificial) love which is spoken about in that passage.

 

[Jade Falcon]

The "Normalcy" of homosexual relations isn't something factual. It's subjective, and therefore an opinion. I have mine, and you have yours, which I accept as your opinion, but not fact. That doesn't make me intolerant.



I can't speak for anyone else, but based on my reading of the Bible, homosexual sex is the only aspect of homosexuality which is considered sinful. I'm fact, I've had this discussion with my wife before. She actually considers me frustratingly liberal because I think that gay person could be in a long term relationship homosexual relationship and be well within the bounds of God's morality if said relationship is asexual.


Actually, you're mis-paraphrasing that verse. 1 John doesn't say you can't love if you don't know God: it says that if you don't love, you don't know God. That's an important distinction. All humans are made in God's image, so all are capable of love. Also, it's important not to conflate "Eros" (romantic) love with "agape" (Godly sacrificial) love which is spoken about in that passage.

Very well said.

 

[dviss1]

your skinny scrawny ass.

Don't be jealous of my good genes. LOL.

At age 40, I have an 8 pack that you can see from space. I can run and sprint for hours. I can still run the 100 in 11 flat. Even though diabetes and heart problems run in my family, I have no health concerns. My testosterone levels are great. I can have hour long sex with no impotence. It's funny how this guy thinks his genes are superior:

It's true.

We used to have to spend a good chunk of everyone's time gathering energy. Almost all the energy on earth back then was solar.

There is no sun at night, the wind doesn't blow all the time. You're going to need to read by candle at night without a 24/7 and cheap energy source.

Progress, my ass.

You should be ashamed of yourself with this post. It makes absolutely no sense and flies in the face of reality. Germany right now shut down 8 of their nuclear plants and plan on shutting all of their nuclear plants down by 2025. So WTF are you talking about? You're comparing the way we would use energy in 10-15 years from now the way we used it before we had electricity? That's just dumb it makes no sense.

 

[PtldPlatypus]

You can call a pig a cow, but it's still a pig. No, all change is not progress, and yes sometimes change is bad, but change leads to progress, we learn from what we err...and being intolerant...excuse me ahem...resistant to all change diminishes and impedes progress

See, it's this type of dismissive and exclusionary language that stifles true discourse. There is a significant difference between resistance and intolerance, not just a semantic once. Similarly, there's a large difference between resistance to some change, and resistance to all change. Also, there are times when progress needs to be impeded; unbound wholesale change--even of a basically positive nature--can often be so disruptive that it does more harm than good.

Taking someone's words and twisting them, even if ever so slightly, to fit your own narrative is not only bad discussion protocol, but it's also a bit rude. I think you're better than that.

 

[Jade Falcon]

See, it's this type of dismissive and exclusionary language that stifles true discourse. There is a significant difference between resistance and intolerance, not just a semantic once. Similarly, there's a large difference between resistance to some change, and resistance to all change. Also, there are times when progress needs to be impeded; unbound wholesale change--even of a basically positive nature--can often be so disruptive that it does more harm than good.

Taking someone's words and twisting them, even if ever so slightly, to fit your own narrative is not only bad discussion protocol, but it's also a bit rude. I think you're better than that.

Well said.

It's hard for me to accept "change" and "progress" when I'm being screamed at, labeled, and openly insulted by the very people who claim to want those two things.

Find a different way to get your point across. Try relating to me about something. Try finding something that we share in common. Try speaking my lingo. Try getting to know me.

Otherwise, you deserve Donald Trump as your president.

 

[dviss1]

The "Normalcy" of homosexual relations isn't something factual. It's subjective, and therefore an opinion. I have mine, and you have yours, which I accept as your opinion, but not fact. That doesn't make me intolerant.

It's everywhere. Animals do it we do it. We are born this way if you're not gay then you can't really speak on it. Maybe you should have more intimate conversations with people. When did you wake up and know that you were heterosexual? You you always were. You didn't suddenly become hetero. You were born that way.

I can't speak for anyone else, but based on my reading of the Bible, homosexual sex is the only aspect of homosexuality which is considered sinful. I'm fact, I've had this discussion with my wife before. She actually considers me frustratingly liberal because I think that gay person could be in a long term relationship homosexual relationship and be well within the bounds of God's morality if said relationship is asexual.


Actually, you're mis-paraphrasing that verse. 1 John doesn't say you can't love if you don't know God: it says that if you don't love, you don't know God. That's an important distinction. All humans are made in God's image, so all are capable of love. Also, it's important not to conflate "Eros" (romantic) love with "agape" (Godly sacrificial) love which is spoken about in that passage.

1 John 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.

So that would indicate that if you do love then you do know God...
So again, who created the love between the gay people if God is love?

 

[PtldPlatypus]

1 John 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.

Again, who created the love between the gay people if God is love?

You realize that I already both explained the difference between what that verse actually says and what you're claiming it says, and answered that question, right?

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Goat wanders into Portland-area 7-Eleven, munches on Skittles

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/01/goat_wanders_into_portland_7-e.html

 

[dviss1]

You realize that I already both explained the difference between what that verse actually says and what you're claiming it says, and answered that question, right?

See edit.

 

[PtldPlatypus]

See edit.

That's the kind of spiritual misinterpretation that gets people in trouble.

Your inference--that saying that those who don't love don't know God implies that everyone who does love does know God would be the same logic as claiming that saying, "If you don't love basketball, then you don't love the Lakers" equates to saying, "If you love basketball, then you love the Lakers."

Just as it is possible for me to love basketball and not love the Lakers, it is possible for a human to love another human but still not know God.

And as I said before, the reason for that is all humans are made in God's image. This doesn't mean that God physically looks like a human, but that we are made with mental, emotional, and spiritual characteristics reflective of God's nature. These characteristics are what differentiate us from animals, and why all humans have the capacity to love in a manner similar to how God loves, even without knowing him.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[dviss1]

Dafuq??

 

[dviss1]

That's the kind of spiritual misinterpretation that gets people in trouble.

Your inference--that saying that those who don't love don't know God implies that everyone who does love does know God would be the same logic as claiming that saying, "If you don't love basketball, then you don't love the Lakers" equates to saying, "If you love basketball, then you love the Lakers."

Just as it is possible for me to love basketball and not love the Lakers, it is possible for a human to love another human but still not know God.

And as I said before, the reason for that is all humans are made in God's image. This doesn't mean that God physically looks like a human, but that we are made with mental, emotional, and spiritual characteristics reflective of God's nature. These characteristics are what differentiate us from animals, and why all humans have the capacity to love in a manner similar to how God loves, even without knowing him.

I guess we'll agree to disagree on your analogy. I don't believe it's a good one. I personally don't subscribe to that man-made book anyway. It was written by fallible men are used to Stone their women if they were raped...

 

[Jade Falcon]

Sly, please tell me that's a joke.

Forgive me...it's become difficult to tell sometimes.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Sly, please tell me that's a joke.

Forgive me...it's become difficult to tell sometimes.

It's only a simple google search away.

http://equitableapp.com/

 

[PtldPlatypus]

I guess we'll agree to disagree on your analogy. I don't believe it's a good one.

Ok, how about this one.

All alt-right's are conservatives, yes? So then it's fair to say, "if you're not a conservative, you're not alt-right." Does that then mean that if you are conservative, then you are alt-right?

If you also don't believe that to be a good analogy, would you care to explain why?

 

[Jade Falcon]

It's only a simple google search away.

http://equitableapp.com/

So it's meant as a joke. Okay.

I shudder to think, however, about how many people will take it seriously.

 

[Denny Crane]

Don't be jealous of my good genes. LOL.

At age 40, I have an 8 pack that you can see from space. I can run and sprint for hours. I can still run the 100 in 11 flat. Even though diabetes and heart problems run in my family, I have no health concerns. My testosterone levels are great. I can have hour long sex with no impotence. It's funny how this guy thinks his genes are superior:

You should be ashamed of yourself with this post. It makes absolutely no sense and flies in the face of reality. Germany right now shut down 8 of their nuclear plants and plan on shutting all of their nuclear plants down by 2025. So WTF are you talking about? You're comparing the way we would use energy in 10-15 years from now the way we used it before we had electricity? That's just dumb it makes no sense.

I have done my research. Energy works as energy works. The same laws of physics applied then and now.

Coal, not nuclear. Though nuclear is clean and coal is not.

http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=26372

Germany’s renewables electricity generation grows in 2015, but coal still dominant

 

[SlyPokerDog]

It's only a simple google search away.

http://equitableapp.com/

It's only for the iphone hipsters.

 

[dviss1]

I have done my research. Energy works as energy works. The same laws of physics applied then and now.

Coal, not nuclear. Though nuclear is clean and coal is not.

http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=26372

Germany’s renewables electricity generation grows in 2015, but coal still dominant

But you act like we wouldn't have light that wouldn't be created by a flame at night. I'm sorry but in 2025 we're not going to be using fucking lanterns. You're not making sense. Just because Cole is still dominant just means that those assholes still have their fingers in creating pollution from fossil fuels. As long as these corporations continue to have us by the balls, yes coal and oil will still be relevant. But if for you think for 1 second that we couldn't be completely solar and not move toward that direction I call bullshit.

 

[Denny Crane]

But you act like we wouldn't have liked that wouldn't be created by a flame at night. I'm sorry but in 2025 we're not going to be using fucking lanterns. You're not making sense. Just because Cole is still dominant just means that those assholes still have their fingers in creating pollution from fossil fuels. As long as these corporations continue to have us by the balls, yes coal and oil will still be relevant. But if for you think for 1 second that we couldn't be completely solar and not move toward that direction I call bullshit.

They're burning coal at night and when the wind isn't blowing.

Rely on green energy, and you will need candles and a gas generator to keep the fridge cold.

Like I said, the physics is impossible to ignore. Or do so to all our detriment.

 

[dviss1]

Ok, how about this one.

All alt-right's are conservatives, yes? So then it's fair to say, "if you're not a conservative, you're not alt-right." Does that then mean that if you are conservative, then you are alt-right?

If you also don't believe that to be a good analogy, would you care to explain why?

If God is love what exists between the two gay people? Love created by God. If God makes no mistakes why are gay people born that way? These analogies don't really matter. What matters is people who concentrate on gay sex more than love. That's my whole point.