Let's move Aldridge (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

For the record . . .

Wayne Embry traded Jabbar to the Lakers and was not fired.

Joe Axelson traded Oscar Robertson to Milwaukee and was not fired.

Kevin McHale traded Kevin Garnett to Boston, and was not fired.

Bob McAdoo was traded a total of 5 times in his career, and none of the GMs responsible were fired.
 
Also, look on the brightside. There is absolutely no GM for the Blazers that can be fired for trading Aldridge (unless Allen wants to double-fire KP for drafting LA in the first place).
 
For the record . . .

Wayne Embry traded Jabbar to the Lakers and was not fired.

Joe Axelson traded Oscar Robertson to Milwaukee and was not fired.

Kevin McHale traded Kevin Garnett to Boston, and was not fired.

Bob McAdoo was traded a total of 5 times in his career, and none of the GMs responsible were fired.

McHale was fired. Are you reading the links?

And yeah the GM wasn't fired, but ownership bolted. What's worse? LOL
 
Re: QQQ


Do you even look at what you post? The link you provided directly contradicts your claims. It states that Garnett was traded in July of 2007, and that McHale continued to be the Minnesota GM for another 18 months. He resigned the GM job to be head coach, and finally left the organization in June of 2009, almost two years after the Garnett trade.

SlyPokerDog is still a joke, my friend.

I did all of this in less than 10 minutes. Would you like more examples? Why Is SlyPokerDog such a joke?
Sly is. See above.

You might also take a look at my previous post, which shows that most of the GMs responsible for the trades I mentioned DID NOT lose their jobs because of it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: QQQ

Do you even look at what you post? The link you provided directly contradicts your claims. It states that Garnett was traded in July of 2007, and that McHale continued to be the Minnesota GM for another 18 months. He resigned the GM job to be head coach, and finally left the organization in June of 2009, almost two years after the Garnett trade.

SlyPokerDog is still a joke, my friend.

Sly is. See above.

You might also take a look at my previous post, which shows that most of the GMs responsible for the trades I mentioned DID NOT lose their jobs because of it.

Well you calling me a joke is a compliment considering this thread LOL.

And I said several GMs were fired; which I gave; even excluding the Minny McKale fiasco. LOL And everyone called McKale an idiot GM, so that tops the cake on that strawman you are trying to pull. Fact... Several GMs were fired for trading away their superstar; which I gave links on; which makes my statement true.
 
Re: QQQ

Well you calling me a joke is a compliment considering this thread LOL.

And I said several GMs were fired; which I gave; even excluding the Minny McKale fiasco. LOL And everyone called McKale an idiot GM, so that tops the cake on that strawman you are trying to pull. Fact... Several GMs were fired for trading away their superstar; which I gave links on; which makes my statement true.

I would trade both you and Shooter for a GM.
 
Re: QQQ

I would trade this entire forum for a competent GM and coaching staff.

So which team would you trade us to?

Miami? Minnesota? Lakers? Spurs? Thunder? Who has the best Coach & GM combo in the NBA currently?
 
Re: QQQ

And I said several GMs were fired; which I gave
No, you said all of them were fired. You apparently don't know what you're posting, or what you're saying in this thread. You are one amusing fellow.
 
Re: QQQ

No, you said all of them were fired. You apparently don't know what you're posting, or what you're saying in this thread. You are one amusing fellow.

You mean like a joke?
 
Re: QQQ

No, you said all of them were fired. You apparently don't know what you're posting, or what you're saying in this thread. You are one amusing fellow.

[video=youtube;o_ff46b58Hk]
 
Re: QQQ

No, you said all of them were fired. You apparently don't know what you're posting, or what you're saying in this thread. You are one amusing fellow.

Yep they all were fired. LOL

Chamberlain, Jabbar, O'Neal, and Malone were all traded in their prime. All of them had some of their best seasons after getting traded. And I hope you're not suggesting we should keep Aldridge because he has a good relationship with the fans . . .

Oneal wasn't traded in his prime and the GM didn't have a choice, so of course he wasn't fired. Chamberlain got the GM fired, which I proved proof.

Are you talking about Moses Malone? You mean because Houston was forced to deal him as well? That is entirely a "strawman argument" as well.

The following season, the Rockets improved their regular season mark to 46–36 but were eliminated in the first round of the playoffs.[39] Although Malone won the league's Most Valuable Player award in that season,[28] in the following offseason, the Rockets traded him to the Philadelphia 76ers for Caldwell Jones,[28] to avoid paying his salary, which was a decision the Rockets were forced to make as they were low on funds due to a declining regional economy at the time.[40] When the Rockets finished a league worst 14–68,[41] Celtics coach Bill Fitch was hired to replace outgoing Del Harris,[40] and after winning a coin flip with the Indiana Pacers to obtain the first pick of the 1983 NBA Draft,[40] the Rockets selected Ralph Sampson from the University of Virginia.[42]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston_Rockets

The ownership asked to get rid of him because they couldn't afford him. A entirely different scenario.

But hey buddy, keep pulling those straws out. I love this thread for my daily supply of laughter! ;)
 
Re: QQQ

Yep they all were fired. LOL



Oneal wasn't traded in his prime and the GM didn't have a choice, so of course he wasn't fired. Chamberlain got the GM fired, which I proved proof.

Are you talking about Moses Malone? You mean because Houston was forced to deal him as well? That is entirely a "strawman argument" as well.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston_Rockets

The ownership asked to get rid of him because they couldn't afford him. A entirely different scenario.

But hey buddy, keep pulling those straws out. I love this thread for my daily supply of laughter! ;)

Portland traded Moses Malone and our GM wasn't fired over it.
 
Re: QQQ

Aldridge isn't a superstar ... so what are you arguing for?

Who said I was? I was the one being called out for saying those GMs got fired for trading their superstar in their prime. I'm just defending what I said after SlyPokerDog obviously was talking from his asshole. :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK--potential semi-comparables using the teams with the league's five worst records:
  • DJ Augustin, BJ Mullens, and the Bobcats' #1
  • Eric Gordon, Carl Landry, and the Hornets' #1
  • Kevin Seraphin, Andray Blatche, and the Wizards' #1
  • Tyreke Evans, Jason Thompson, and the Kings' #1
  • Jose Calderon, Demar Derozan, and the Raptors' #1

How many of those would you trade Aldridge for? Or, how many of those teams would make that deal for Aldridge?

Now that we're in tank/rebuild mode (and it was mentioned in another thread), let's revisit this question. IF we get the Nets' pick this year, AND were to trade Aldridge for a package like one of the above, which would you go for?
 
Now that we're in tank/rebuild mode (and it was mentioned in another thread), let's revisit this question. IF we get the Nets' pick this year, AND were to trade Aldridge for a package like one of the above, which would you go for?

I just don't see any team giving up the only sure fire #1 pick. I would do it if they agree.
 
I just don't see any team giving up the only sure fire #1 pick. I would do it if they agree.

I'm not assuming that they're giving up the #1 overall, just an unprotected top-5.
 
The only place LaMarcus Aldridge should be moved is to starting center - so we can use our highest draft pick on one of the stud power forwards in this draft. Keep one quality big man and add another. And, then is he's cheap enough, resign JJ Hickson to back them up. With the current lack of quality centers in the league, and the rate centers seem to get injured, you can never have too many quality bigs. We have one better than average, all-star quality big man. Rather than trade him, we should be adding to him.

BNM
 
The only place LaMarcus Aldridge should be moved is to starting center - so we can use our highest draft pick on one of the stud power forwards in this draft. Keep one quality big man and add another. And, then is he's cheap enough, resign JJ Hickson to back them up. With the current lack of quality centers in the league, and the rate centers seem to get injured, you can never have too many quality bigs. We have one better than average, all-star quality big man. Rather than trade him, we should be adding to him.

BNM

Good post. +1
 
The rest of the team just needs to play like they did last night, even when Aldridge is on the court. When Roy first went down, we saw the ball movement and player movement vastly improved, but now LA has become our new Roy.
 
The only place LaMarcus Aldridge should be moved is to starting center - so we can use our highest draft pick on one of the stud power forwards in this draft. Keep one quality big man and add another. And, then is he's cheap enough, resign JJ Hickson to back them up. With the current lack of quality centers in the league, and the rate centers seem to get injured, you can never have too many quality bigs. We have one better than average, all-star quality big man. Rather than trade him, we should be adding to him.

BNM

Couldn't have said it better. You can't trade a proven big who plays at an All-Star level for secondary bigs, marginal PGs, and unknown draft picks. Instead of getting rid of LMA, the focus should be to find another All-NBA player who can compliment LMA's game and take some of the focus off of him late in games.
 
BNM has it down, put him at the C fulltime, draft a top PF, get JJ to backup the spots - and RUN.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top