KingSpeed
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 63,334
- Likes
- 22,512
- Points
- 113
And start who at SG?Id say turn cj into our 6th man of the year guy. Bring him off the bench.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And start who at SG?Id say turn cj into our 6th man of the year guy. Bring him off the bench.
And start who at SG?
For me, a lot of it comes from him not wanting to be hear and hin being immature when he was here. Now it seems like he wishes he was still here and seems to have matured a bit. He did blame others for their issue which was weak but idk, I just dont have that hatred.Same, I never really understood the level of hate that some fans still have. I hate how it all went down but if he didn't have a relationship with Lillard at the time, I can understand why he might move on. With the comments in the article it's pretty apparent that Aldridge doesn't have any bad feelings about Portland.
But it still sucks when players choose to leave. That's why I don't take Lillard, Nurk, and yes, CJ, for granted. They actually want to be here.
Yes, but he still a snakeYou put LA on this squad, we might make the finals!
He's a diva. Right now, he would help this team. Two years from now, meh. Hard pass.LaMarshmallow who? Forget that guy. First, the problem was Roy, then it was Oden, finally it was Dame. It was always someone else. You know what I think? The problem was him. It's always going to be him.
No reunion. He's gone and should stay gone.
I know people are bitter still, but if you put Aldridge on this current team, you probably have a championship contender. Dame, CJ, LMA, Nurk.
Additionally, having Aldridge probably means we wouldn't have had the unfortunate situation of signing Turner, Crabbe, Leonard and Harkless to those awful deals....
I don’t get the animosity. It’s fucking stupid. Acting like grudge-holding 3rd graders won’t get this team out of the first round. If you can bring him back, you do it.
The thought is he left us high and dry to better pastures. That didn't work out, and we are back in the mix being competative and now he wants to open the door after we have rebuilt WITHOUT him after losing several years of prime Dame, CJ and Aldridge time, which would have competed for a ring the past few seasons instead of struggling?
I wouldn't be mad if he came back, but I don't like Aldridge for abandoning the Blazers in his prime that had a prime Damian Lillard.
The way I see it, if we had kept Aldridge, Olshey likely wouldn't have made some of the moves that he's made since then. Would Nurk be on the roster? Would the Blazers have kept Batum and his intermittent contributions? The only relevant questions to me are, when Aldridge becomes available, will he add a missing ingredient that will let the team be more successful and what will it cost to get him? If those questions can be answered positively, I certainly don't have a problem with bringing him back. I didn't care for the way he left; the fact that he said he wanted to stay and be the greatest Blazer evers, but ultimately left the team without allowing the Blazers to get any value out of him. In the long run, though, the past is the past and all I care about it getting this team to the point where it can compete for a title ASAP. If Aldridge is a part of that, great.
The problem is I don't see LaMarcus ever accepting a bench role.Only 7 million of the last year of his contract is guaranteed. If waived, he would only be 35 at the start of 2020-21. Even at 36, there are players still productive this season. Tyson Chandler, Dirk, Pau, and Nene are all big men that have contributed this season.
https://stats.nba.com/players/bio/?sort=AGE&dir=1
I would take an Aldridge coming off the bench defensively at 36 over Kanter right now.
Olshey and Paul Allen were in DC pitching to Greg Monroe before Aldridge made his decision to go to SA.Probably would have tweaked the roster to compete for a championship. Guys like Brook Lopez, etc.
If he does want to come back to Portland is it because he wants to play for the Blazers, or is it because SA didn't work out the way he figured it would? If it's the former, I would be willing to consider it. If it is the latter - forget it. We don't need a player, no matter how talented, who is just going through the motions for a paycheck.
The problem is I don't see LaMarcus ever accepting a bench role.
You were gone, but we’re happy you’re back!LaMarshmallow who? Forget that guy. First, the problem was Roy, then it was Oden, finally it was Dame. It was always someone else. You know what I think? The problem was him. It's always going to be him.
No reunion. He's gone and should stay gone.
He's a diva. Right now, he would help this team. Two years from now, meh. Hard pass.
If he does want to come back to Portland is it because he wants to play for the Blazers, or is it because SA didn't work out the way he figured it would? If it's the former, I would be willing to consider it. If it is the latter - forget it. We don't need a player, no matter how talented, who is just going through the motions for a paycheck.
Shooting fewer long jumpers now than ever in his career.You guys want that SOFT ASS, SOFT MINDED, JUMP SHOOTING, DEFENSIVE LIABILITY, SELFISH, LYING PIECE OF SHIT on my team?
FUCK THAT.
Y'all know better....
Shooting fewer long jumpers now than ever in his career.
Had positive DWS and DBPM his entire career.
Has clearly matured over the past 3.5 years.
Dame would take him back.
Yes, I would take him back too. People change; people grow.
