magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
He's available. I would bring him in and move stotts to head assistant coach. Anyone else down with that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's available. I would bring him in and move stotts to head assistant coach. Anyone else down with that?
Down with bringing him in as a defensive (head) assistant. If Nate can do it (assist) then why not Lionel.
Why is everyone Anti-Stotts? The guy did wonders last year with a decent starting 5 and a non-existent bench. He coaches an entertaining brand of basketball, and looks to have the stuff to guide this team to some playoff runs. I don't get it. I'm not against The Train coming back to coach in Portland, but Jesus, throwing Stotts under the bus before he's even had a chance to show his worth is ridiculous.
I don't like Hollins. He's kind of like Nate.
He's available. I would bring him in and move stotts to head assistant coach. Anyone else down with that?
Looks good, Stotts' hasn't shown much game.
This comment absolutely floors me. Did you expect him to win a title with last year's roster?
We didn't come close to that mark did we? Not very close to even being good.
I did expect to see some quality basketball attempted. A system of play that looked as if it were designed to exploit the talents available repeatedly. Instead I saw some guys trying to sort it out.
And worst of all, it didn't appear that Myers Leonard even had a coach trying to make a center out of him.
