Politics Manafort could face ‘rest of life in prison,’ judge says

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
130,215
Likes
150,865
Points
115
Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman, runs a significant risk of spending the rest of his life in prison and the evidence against him by special counsel Robert Mueller’s office seems strong, a federal judge declared in an order made public on Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III, who is based in Alexandria, Virginia, and is assigned to a newly filed indictment against Manafort dealing with bank fraud and tax evasion, said the veteran lobbyist and political consultant posed “a substantial risk of flight” because of his assets and the gravity of his legal predicament.


“The defendant is a person of great wealth who has the financial means and international connections to flee and remain at large, as well as every incentive to do so,” Ellis wrote in an order setting the terms of what the judge called “home incarceration” for Manafort, 68, who lives in Alexandria but also has homes in Florida and on Long Island.

“Given the nature of the charges against the defendant and the apparent weight of the evidence against him, defendant faces the very real possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison,” wrote Ellis, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan.

The order, dated Friday, puts Manafort in a “24-hour-a-day lockdown” at his Alexandria condo, except for medical appointments or emergencies, court appearances and meeting with his defense attorneys. Ellis did not require Manafort to post any assets, but did order that he pay $10 million if he fails to appear in court.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/13/judge-manafort-could-face-rest-of-life-in-prison-460302
 
Paul is going to sing...sing
 
“Given the nature of the charges against the defendant and the apparent weight of the evidence against him, defendant faces the very real possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison,” wrote Ellis...

Grounds for complete dismissal of the case due to obvious prejudice and pre-judgement by the judge of record.

Also grounds for disbarment of the "judge".
 
“Given the nature of the charges against the defendant and the apparent weight of the evidence against him, defendant faces the very real possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison,” wrote Ellis...

Grounds for complete dismissal of the case due to obvious prejudice and pre-judgement by the judge of record.

Also grounds for disbarment of the "judge".

You should donate to the Manafort defense fund.

https://manafortdefense.org/
 
And, once again, we see the desperation of Mueller and his crack team of Democrat lawyers. They’ve got nothing on Trump so they’re going after Manafort for things that have nothing to do with Trump.
 
And, once again, we see the desperation of Mueller and his crack team of Democrat lawyers. They’ve got nothing on Trump so they’re going after Manafort for things that have nothing to do with Trump.

They’re going after Manafort for things he did that are illegal.
 
And, once again, we see the desperation of Mueller and his crack team of Democrat lawyers. They’ve got nothing on Trump so they’re going after Manafort for things that have nothing to do with Trump.

Yep, I wouldn't worry about Trump. Nothing bad is going to happen to him legally. Now, doesn't that make you feel better?
 
They’re going after Manafort for things he did that are illegal.
Yes, of course, but they wouldn’t be going after him at all if he weren’t part of Trump’s team. They’re so desperate to make Trump look bad that they are trying to nail people for anything they can find. And what they’re nailing Manafort has nothing at all to do with Trump’s campaign for president.
 
Dog is judge and jury.

The man is innocent until proven guilty. His crimes are alleged ones at this point. He is contesting the charges, and there are two sides to the story; we've heard only one side so far.

That said, we should be wary of taking a sentence here and there out of context.

The judge isn't prejudging anything. He is stating a fact. Manafort, if convicted, may well die in jail. For this reason, his wealth, and others, he is a flight risk. That's all the judge was talking about. He's right.

Manafort was told he was going to be indicted long before he was. He could have fled US jurisdiction at any time. But he didn't. There's something to be said for that, too. I don't think he's a fool.
 
Yep, I wouldn't worry about Trump. Nothing bad is going to happen to him legally. Now, doesn't that make you feel better?

What is it you get out of making a post like this? I am serious, how does the gratification come?
 
What is it you get out of making a post like this? I am serious, how does the gratification come?

I would suggest you stick to discussing my posts and not my character.
 
Dog is judge and jury.

The man is innocent until proven guilty. His crimes are alleged ones at this point. He is contesting the charges, and there are two sides to the story; we've heard only one side so far.

That said, we should be wary of taking a sentence here and there out of context.

The judge isn't prejudging anything. He is stating a fact. Manafort, if convicted, may well die in jail. For this reason, his wealth, and others, he is a flight risk. That's all the judge was talking about. He's right.

Manafort was told he was going to be indicted long before he was. He could have fled US jurisdiction at any time. But he didn't. There's something to be said for that, too. I don't think he's a fool.

Why not tell this to Maris regarding Biden?
 
Asking a question is hardly discussing your character.

That would depend on the question and yours clearly qualifies as a character insult.
 
That would depend on the question and yours clearly qualifies as a character insult.

Oh! I see. Well I did not intend it to be.
But I can see, where it probably would depend on the answer to the question.:cool2:
 
Oh! I see. Well I did not intend it to be.
But I can see, where it probably would depend on the answer to the question.:cool2:

I don't see where the answer has anything to do with the question.

But I will accept your statement about your intention or rather your statement about a lack of an intention about a challenge to my character.
 
Biden is caught on camera.

Caught on camera doing what? And why isn't he being charged for a crime? Because it would get laughed out of court, that's why.
 
And, once again, we see the desperation of Mueller and his crack team of Democrat lawyers. They’ve got nothing on Trump so they’re going after Manafort for things that have nothing to do with Trump.

Says your buddy Trump. But he's a goddamn liar so... :dunno:
 
Caught on camera doing what? And why isn't he being charged for a crime? Because it would get laughed out of court, that's why.

Being creepy. If he were in office, #metoo would be all over it.

Most, if not all, of the high profile men (and women) who have lost their jobs or resigned from govt. office haven't been charged "for" a crime.
 
Stop deflecting. Biden doesn't hold office like the pissy prez.

I didn't bring him up, I just explained why he's not "innocent until proven guilty." Manafort is charged with alleged crimes, Biden is simply caught on camera being creepy. We have no idea if Manafort really is guilty. We can see with our own eyes that Biden is creepy.
 
Being creepy. If he were in office, #metoo would be all over it.

Most, if not all, of the high profile men (and women) who have lost their jobs or resigned from govt. office haven't been charged "for" a crime.

Creepy? In what way? In your imagination? Like I say, if he was doing something wrong why not charge him with a crime? You know why? Because it's all made up. He's a decent human being, that's clear to see.
 
Being creepy. If he were in office, #metoo would be all over it.

Most, if not all, of the high profile men (and women) who have lost their jobs or resigned from govt. office haven't been charged "for" a crime.

Some of those people have already been convicted of felonies while others have been indicted. I'll bet you that other indictments will follow.
 
Creepy? In what way? In your imagination? Like I say, if he was doing something wrong why not charge him with a crime? You know why? Because it's all made up. He's a decent human being, that's clear to see.

hahahahaha

SlyPokerDog is ignorant and blind.

Seriously?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top