This is the opposite end of the Allen Crabbe discussion: he’s paid because he makes shots; he’s overpaid because all those shots are catch and shoot shots. But when your primary scorers are also your primary ball handlers, every time they pass the ball, it needs to be to a better shooter than them, or the shot quality will always go down as the play goes on.
You also have to have guys that can create their own shot, dribble and pass. Lillard and McCollum and Napier to a much smaller extent are really the only ones we have. A ball handling small forward would go a long ways towards defeating the double and triple teaming of Lillard.
My only real preference is not recycling through the current crop of mediocre NBA coaches. Whether it's a current NBA assistant, or an NCAA/Euro head/assistant, or some smart dude (or lady!) from the film room or broadcasting booth, I really don't care.
Whoa whoa whoa. You know how many of @HCP posts I've liked over the years?I'm not gonna "like" this post because then you might think I agree that you are double loser.
I really dislike the disrespect you post with. Quit telling people their opinions are irrelevant.
How do I know I don't like it unless I read it? How can I un-read it? It was posted to forum. I'm a part of the forum. So it was posted to me. Quit being an ass to everyone.
I think I read both of them
Pity likes in the hundreds. Maybe thousands. Does he have that many?
It was so nice for a while.
He said there were murmurs in the coaching circles... very well could have been.
Yup. I passed the drama-torch to him. He turned it into a bonfire.
This reads like one drawn-out "yes".
Does this mean we go for a Spurs hot shot assistant? Only for said assistant to accept job then back out and return to be heir apparent of the Spurs franchise?
A coaching change would just be shuffling the deck chairs and not addressing the leaky D and lack of enough perimeter threats. Hopefully Zach adds strength and confidence to blossom in year 2... they need him to deserve a bigger role. Hopefully the humiliation vs NO lights a fire in Nurk to focus on his game as he's obviously still some major things that he could improve on. That he's just about to turn 24 gives hope that maturity will bring that focus. But they truly need to add a long versatile SF who can defend and lace jumpers. That should be the clear offseason focus for who ever the GM is.
To me it was just about Houston being hot. It’s a make or miss league and all of their role players were hot on the same night meanwhile, GS outside of Durant were pretty bad. I still think GS is gonna win this series in 6.
Pop said that before Marc Jackson as far as I know. Sometimes it’s pretty fitting and I think in this series it’s going to be really fitting. They both take so many 3’s the team making them that night is going to win by a wide margin. We may get a game where both teams are making them. With the popularity of the 3 pointer I feel like it’s truer than ever, it’s why there seems to be so many huge swings in every game.
