Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When we did our West predictions before the season, I put Minnesota at 9. They really have a bunch of good players. Looks like I wasn't that far off. They have a great shot at 10!
Ex-Blazer threads are merged on the main board, and deceased BLAZER fan threads are jettisoned to the OT board without any comment.
Cowards.
Haha... they're already at 11. 7-3 in their last 10.
They're not going to get to .500, but 25 or 30 wins isn't out of the question if they can keep beating bad teams.
Ed O.
They're at 10 actually, just ahead of Memphis, I believe.
Ex-Blazer threads are merged on the main board, and deceased BLAZER fan threads are jettisoned to the OT board without any comment.
Cowards.
Someone's a little grumpy?
They're at 10 actually, just ahead of Memphis, I believe.
Whoa, let's not confuse people with the fact here.
What are your sources that indicate my "fact" is wrong?
Please let me and everyone else know how I'm wrong (again).
KThanx.
Ed O.
Could you give an example?
You know what PapaG, I'm sure you're going to make me out to be an insensitive prick, but I really don't care. I personally think stories like that have no business being in the sports section. A lot of people, myself included, follow sports to escape their problems. Escape the world and things like the recession. They turn on the game, and for a couple hours they only think about NBA basketball. Not their jobs, not their homework, not their bills... just basketball.
My Grandmother died from cancer. She was a HUGE Blazers fan. Why do I want to open the Oregonian, turn to the sports section, and read a story about a girl dying from cancer? If Canzano wants to tell her story, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that and I commend him for it, but he should have done it where it belonged... in the living section.
Now, you're crying because the mods made the correct decision, the decision that Canzano and his editor failed to do... They kept something that was unrelated to sports in its proper place.
You know what PapaG, I'm sure you're going to make me out to be an insensitive prick, but I really don't care. I personally think stories like that have no business being in the sports section. A lot of people, myself included, follow sports to escape their problems. Escape the world and things like the recession. They turn on the game, and for a couple hours they only think about NBA basketball. Not their jobs, not their homework, not their bills... just basketball.
My Grandmother died from cancer. She was a HUGE Blazers fan. Why do I want to open the Oregonian, turn to the sports section, and read a story about a girl dying from cancer? If Canzano wants to tell her story, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that and I commend him for it, but he should have done it where it belonged... in the living section.
Now, you're crying because the mods made the correct decision, the decision that Canzano and his editor failed to do... They kept something that was unrelated to sports in its proper place.
I don't know if I agree with that. It's not like her story dominated the broadcast of an NBA game. That should be your escape from the world -- is watching the Blazers play.
The job of a newspaper is tell the different stories out there, and this one has seemingly been able to touch a lot of people in a Blazer-related way. That's the beauty of sports, is that it reaches out to so many different kinds of people.
Canzano's piece reminds me of something you'd read by Rick Reilly, and his column was the most prominent in Sports Illustrated before he left.
Sports journalism today is more than just straight play by play of a game..