- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,537
- Likes
- 25,697
- Points
- 113
26, crabbe and Meyers? Yeah I'd do that. For George. I'd do anything for love... but I won't do that.
FTFY.
barfo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
26, crabbe and Meyers? Yeah I'd do that. For George. I'd do anything for love... but I won't do that.
Kevin Love is closer to 6'8 than 6'10.As long as Kevin is ok on living on the outside. But they are both 6-10 above whose strengths are similar. Nurkic is a better shot blocker. But they both can get it done from inside and outside. I guess I'm wondering from an athleticism standpoint. Would we be giving anything up up front.
As long as Kevin is ok on living on the outside. But they are both 6-10 above whose strengths are similar. Nurkic is a better shot blocker. But they both can get it done from inside and outside. I guess I'm wondering from an athleticism standpoint. Would we be giving anything up up front.
This Indiana writer proposes crabbe, 15, and 20 for George. Just interesting to get an outside perspective.
Done. I'll take that risk of PG walking. At the worst, we lose PG next summer and also rid ourselves of the AC contract.
I'll take that risk in hopes that we have enough to retain PG. Like OG, but his knees scare me. And let's not even get into Giles' knee issues.And look dumb when Anunoby becomes next Leonard and Giles is a superstar at Indiana.
I'll take that risk in hopes that we have enough to retain PG. Like OG, but his knees scare me. And let's not even get into Giles' knee issues.
If he truly wants to win as he has said, he won't find a better core than Dame-CJ-Nurk to partner with in LA.
Why are they likely to acquire another high profile free agent? Who was the last high profile free agent signed by the Lakers? Any in the past 20 years?Thing is, he might. They will have Ball, Russell and Ingram - three exciting young talents, and are IMO very likely to acquire Cousins or another high profile free agent in free agency. Ball-Russell-Ingram-George-Cousins is a very good core.
Lonzo is not going to LakersThing is, he might. They will have Ball, Russell and Ingram - three exciting young talents, and are IMO very likely to acquire Cousins or another high profile free agent in free agency. Ball-Russell-Ingram-George-Cousins is a very good core.
Thing is, he might. They will have Ball, Russell and Ingram - three exciting young talents, and are IMO very likely to acquire Cousins or another high profile free agent in free agency. Ball-Russell-Ingram-George-Cousins is a very good core.
Lonzo is not going to Lakers
I'd change this to:Ball unproven
Russell unproven
Ingram unproven
Cousins not on team
And look dumb when Anunoby becomes next Leonard and Giles is a superstar at Indiana.
Thing is, he might. They will have Ball, Russell and Ingram - three exciting young talents, and are IMO very likely to acquire Cousins or another high profile free agent in free agency. Ball-Russell-Ingram-George-Cousins is a very good core.
BTW, the guy who just forced the Pacers' hand (PG's agent, Aaron Mintz) also represents our very own Meyers Leonard and Allen Crabbe.
Just sayin.
I just love that there are blazers fans that would still find something to complain about if we got PAUL GEORGE without touching our core. That's hilarious to me.
Do you want 'Melo, or do you want Love? Because I think Cleveland would prefer 'Melo to Love, and I think I'd prefer Love to 'Melo.If we can swing a deal for PG, you go all in and get Melo as well.
Dame/CJ/PG/Melo/Nurk would have a shot in the WCFs. No way PG will leave then.
Either would work. I like Melo in big game situations, but Love is younger. Both would serve the exact same role.Do you want 'Melo, or do you want Love? Because I think Cleveland would prefer 'Melo to Love, and I think I'd prefer Love to 'Melo.
