miller for nate robinson and eddy curry?

[Eastoff]

Could we get this to work? The salaries are pretty different though =\

 

[MickZagger]

No thanks.

 

[Shapecity]

You can do much better.

 

[Fez Hammersticks]

GTFO with that

 

[KingSpeed]

No.

 

[alex42083]

Serious? Eddy Curry?

 

[The Sebastian Express]

Why would we take on his contract that isn't insured and help the Knicks clear cap space?

 

[KingSpeed]

Why would we take on his contract that isn't insured and help the Knicks clear cap space?

For Roy's buddy Nate Robinson, I guess.

 

[BenDavis503]

Could we get this to work? The salaries are pretty different though =\

Why would you want to do that? Miller is one of our best players.

 

[oldguy]

Are you a closet Knicks fan?

Go Blazers

 

[Eastoff]

really I did no research other than i saw eddy curry is a center.

 

[WillG]

Hell no.
Keep Miller.
Trade Blake, Outlaw, Webster.

 

[ebott]

The knicks wouldn't do it. Nate and Curry are both expiring contracts. Miller wouldn't do them much good and he'd cost them eight million in cap space this summer.

As a blazer fan I'd hapilly do it. Miller is wasted on this team and we need some help.

 

[hasoos]

To put it lightly, FUCK NO!

 

[illmatic99]

WTF are you smokin?

EDDY FUCKIN CURRY?!

 

[hasoos]

WTF are you smokin?

EDDY FUCKIN CURRY?!

AKA Eddie "Eats too much" Curry!

 

[drexlersdad]

The knicks wouldn't do it. Nate and Curry are both expiring contracts.

wrong on both counts, curry has a large player option for next year he will surely pick up, and this would save the knicks a few million for next year and also give them miller whom could feasibly be traded for an expiring, whereas curry...not so much.