- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,532
- Likes
- 25,693
- Points
- 113
so the point is, that they are still in poverty, so we should just let them starve to death?
Starvin's too good for the likes of them.
barfo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so the point is, that they are still in poverty, so we should just let them starve to death?
so the point is, that they are still in poverty, so we should just let them starve to death?
stay classy san diego
The point is, for what people put into the system, they should be getting a better retirement than $1230/month.
Social Security is roughly a 12.5% withholding from your income for typically 40-45 years. If, instead, you withheld 3% and bought T-Bills with the money, you'd have better than a $1230/month retirement (almost $2500/month, actually).
$1230/month is roughy the equivalent of minimum wage, or $7.50/hr.
http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/ans...-social-security-benefit-for-a-retired-worker
The average monthly Social Security benefit for a retired worker was about $1,230 at the beginning of 2012.
(that would be $14,760/yr)
http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/12poverty.shtml
Persons in household: 1 - poverty level $11,160
Persons in household: 2 - poverty level $15,130 (whoops, that $14,760/yr is below the poverty level)
This is true. And it is 100% from Social Security and Disability. My point is, it doesn't matter how many houses you have you should still have to contribute to what the country decided was going to be a safety net for Widows, Orphaned children, and the elderly.
Flawed math.
The $14,760 is $3600 ABOVE the poverty level for 1 person. $29,520 is WAY above the poverty level for 2 people...
So you are an advocate for making SSN a livable wage?
We agree! ;-)
So you agree with partial privatization of social security!!! awesome.
You will have to come up with something aside from talking points to convince me it's not a good idea.
Why is it a good idea?
Right now, 12.5% is taken out of everyone's paycheck (up to $106K). Take out 9.5% and use as they do now - to make the existing ponzi scheme viable for the short term. Take out 3% and put in something like a mandatory 401K or pension plan, with govt. approved fund managers. Still taking out 12.5%, still funding the transfer of wealth from this generation to the retired one.
Both people had to work full time to get $29,520 in payments.
Hell no I don't agree. Ok let's turn over our social safety net to wall street. That's smart... And when under Bush we were trading UNDER 7000 but you want to put people's money on the market. Right now if the market crashes (and it's trading over 13,000 under Barack) people's money would be lost.
We are living in a society where both parents work now man....
Peoples' money isn't lost when the market has a downturn. It's lost when companies go out of business. Or if people sell all their stock at a significant loss.
You said the stock market was 7000 during Bush's term. What's it at now?
And we're not turning over our social security safety net to wall street under this scenario. There's still 9.5% of peoples' incomes funding the ponzi scheme part.
Half the marriages don't last, and the one income earner ends up not being able to afford property taxes on what Social Security pays. Let me know what you can rent for ~$350/month near you, because that's the kind of housing SS pays for.
Which emphasizes my point that the Cap should be raised and the payout should be raised as well.
Trading well over 13K. But Obama is bad for Wall Street...
He's great for Wall Street. Big insurance, the banks, etc., got hundreds of $billions, if not $trillions from the guy. To boot, the Fed has interest rates so low there really isn't any place to invest money besides the market, unless you want to make < 1% in a savings account. 1% doesn't even keep up with inflation.
He's great for Wall Street. Big insurance, the banks, etc., got hundreds of $billions, if not $trillions from the guy. To boot, the Fed has interest rates so low there really isn't any place to invest money besides the market, unless you want to make < 1% in a savings account. 1% doesn't even keep up with inflation.
When, not if, this thing bursts, it is going to hurt the middle class. The rich will make money off it. The common "investor" and those relying on their 401ks are going to take a beating.
glenn beck pretty much nailed it, the next bubble will be the money/asset bubble, and likely the last bubble for a long long while
buy guns and penicillin
Think of the bondholders for GM, but on a much larger scale. 401k plan are going to become worthless for the average middle-class schlub like myself.
Some of those holding GM were middle-class 401k people not even knowing they were screwed over by the GM takeover. Imagine what happens when the money starts leaving the US markets?
