magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
Forget the eye test, which is pretty damn accurate already...  Let's just be forensic right now.
http://www.82games.com/1314/1314POR.HTM
Mo is getting a PER of 11.0, but gives up 17.9 to his opponents. That is a whopping 6.9 PER minus! Then look at when he's on the floor and off the floor.
On the Floor: The team is a 1.1, but off the floor our team is a whopping +13.0.
His eFG is a dismal 47%, but the telling tale is how he is used. His usage is 20.7 for a shitty 11.3 PER.
He is a definite liability to this team. Either Stotts does something like take some of his minutes away and bring in Watson, or Olshey find some team that would like him to be the shooting guard off the bench.
I know, I know, wait until CJ comes back. I've said this too. But lets be honest here. CJ will be basically the same player Mo is to our club. I am not comfortable with two players that is a scoring guard, not a facilitator.
				
			http://www.82games.com/1314/1314POR.HTM
Mo is getting a PER of 11.0, but gives up 17.9 to his opponents. That is a whopping 6.9 PER minus! Then look at when he's on the floor and off the floor.
On the Floor: The team is a 1.1, but off the floor our team is a whopping +13.0.
His eFG is a dismal 47%, but the telling tale is how he is used. His usage is 20.7 for a shitty 11.3 PER.
He is a definite liability to this team. Either Stotts does something like take some of his minutes away and bring in Watson, or Olshey find some team that would like him to be the shooting guard off the bench.
I know, I know, wait until CJ comes back. I've said this too. But lets be honest here. CJ will be basically the same player Mo is to our club. I am not comfortable with two players that is a scoring guard, not a facilitator.
 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 Well-played.
 Well-played. 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		