dviss1 Emcee Referee Joined Aug 10, 2011 Messages 29,691 Likes 27,681 Points 113 Nov 9, 2017 #121 tester551 said: Since Harkless was a target for the Knicks, I'd propose: Hark + Meyers for Lee + OQuinn Click to expand... I don't think we need O'Quinn. Ed Davis is better IMO.
tester551 said: Since Harkless was a target for the Knicks, I'd propose: Hark + Meyers for Lee + OQuinn Click to expand... I don't think we need O'Quinn. Ed Davis is better IMO.
GrandJury Well-Known Member Joined Jul 24, 2017 Messages 1,139 Likes 445 Points 83 Nov 9, 2017 #122 Strenuus said: Click to expand... Ooook
Scalma Well-Known Member Joined May 18, 2014 Messages 23,631 Likes 34,982 Points 113 Nov 9, 2017 #123 SportsAndWhine said: Well, if Harkless won't shoot, and Layman can't shoot... Click to expand... We don't need either, but one still hasn't had a chance.
SportsAndWhine said: Well, if Harkless won't shoot, and Layman can't shoot... Click to expand... We don't need either, but one still hasn't had a chance.
tester551 Well-Known Member Joined Jan 23, 2009 Messages 4,037 Likes 3,850 Points 113 Nov 9, 2017 #124 dviss1 said: I don't think we need O'Quinn. Ed Davis is better IMO. Click to expand... They're similar IMO. I like that KOQ at least has some shot outside of 3-ft. Honestly, the purpose of including KOQ in the trade is to dump Meyer's contract.
dviss1 said: I don't think we need O'Quinn. Ed Davis is better IMO. Click to expand... They're similar IMO. I like that KOQ at least has some shot outside of 3-ft. Honestly, the purpose of including KOQ in the trade is to dump Meyer's contract.