Politics Mueller indicts 13 Russian nationals for US election meddling

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
So yeah, I have a hard time seeing how the Russians' alleged use of social media is a crime.

If it is, Clinton and her allies guilty, too.

And no, I do not accept that it's OK for one and not the other, which is surely the spin someone (unnamed for now) is sure to apply to this.

What is described is hardly (meaning it isn't) any suggestion that the Russians came close to making a dent in peoples' opinions, their votes, or the election.
 
Troll.

The constitutional scholars agree that Mueller is going to have a tough sell because of the 1st amendment.

Hey, I said the same thing as did MarAzul.

I get it. You don't. I get that, too.
 
Denny Crane said:
Troll.

The constitutional scholars agree that Mueller is going to have a tough sell because of the 1st amendment.

Hey, I said the same thing as did MarAzul.

I get it. You don't. I get that, too.
Click to expand...

You get what exactly? Name calling? Completely getting wrong what Mueller's mandate is? Making up fake arguments so you can declare some sort of victory?
 
/ignore

Done with your trolling.
 
Denny Crane said:
Don't worry. Mueller's case doesn't appear to have the law on his side.
Click to expand...

All the defendants were charged with one count of conspiracy to defraud the US; the IRA and two defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud; and the IRA and four defendants were charged with aggravated identity theft.
 
julius said:
Anyone want to explain to @HCP what "incontrovertible" means?

Here's a hint, it has nothing to do with a car.
Click to expand...

200.gif
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Uh....so?

Luckily for Trump, unwittingly is a common term used for his campaign staff.
Click to expand...

Well, one 'so?' is that Trump's been lying about this for a year and a half - he was shown the evidence and has been saying it's maybe China or a 400 lb guy on a bed. Not that him lying is a news flash, of course.

barfo
 
barfo said:
Well, one 'so?' is that Trump's been lying about this for a year and a half - he was shown the evidence and has been saying it's maybe China or a 400 lb guy on a bed. Not that him lying is a news flash, of course.

barfo
Click to expand...
He's said OVER and OVER that there was no collusion. So much so that libbies made it a point to say "it isn't collusion that is the problem, it is OBSTRUCTION of justice"

Basically blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Turns out it was a nothing burger the whole time. You guys got your bun and your lettuce and your mayonnaise but you ain't got no meat. Haha

And....

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...idential-campaigns/ar-BBJfPpQ?ocid=spartanntp

Sneaky Russians
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
He's said OVER and OVER that there was no collusion. So much so that libbies made it a point to say "it isn't collusion that is the problem, it is OBSTRUCTION of justice"

Basically blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Turns out it was a nothing burger the whole time. You guys got your bun and your lettuce and your mayonnaise but you ain't got no meat. Haha

And....

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...idential-campaigns/ar-BBJfPpQ?ocid=spartanntp

Sneaky Russians
Click to expand...

Helping Bernie and Jill and Trump makes perfect sense if the goal is to block Hillary.

I'm afraid you are taking your victory lap way too soon. This particular indictment does not include any collusion-related charges. That doesn't mean none are coming.

I personally don't know if any are coming later or not. However, I think there will be enough money laundering and obstruction charges to keep me entertained either way.

And as for him saying "OVER and OVER" that there is no collusion - doesn't that suggest strongly there was collusion? He's not exactly known for his veracity.

barfo
 
Russians behind every anti-Trump demonstration since the election.

Naive Dems nothing but Putin Puppets. :cheers:
 
MarAzul said:
Only you can see it. Doesn't that suggest something to you?
Click to expand...

The important question is whether Mueller can see it and prove it. We don't know the answer to that yet.

barfo
 
MarAzul said:
Only you can see it. Doesn't that suggest something to you?
Click to expand...
If that's what you think, you need to catch up on your liberal media reading....you're way behind...let me suggest that to you...barfo has lots of company...these investigations take time to unravel....it's not over yet....the whole point of the investigation was Russian involvement...now that's been proven beyond a doubt..don't see why we wouldn't all want to address that...unfortunately the president didn't want to address it even though that's a pretty important part of his job description...lot of ghosts in the closet..lot of firings...complete lack of trust at the top...is what it is. Let it unfold...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top