Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,169
- Likes
- 57,378
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And Kevin McCarthy, Ted Kremlin Cruz, Trump......And please tell me how owing a Tesla is hypocritical for her? (noting that being a hypocrite is never a problem on the right. See McConnel, Mitch.)
Start a GoFundMe and demand she donates $100.
Sounds like that nasty Capitalism stuff. Yuck.I don't get it. So, she is for green values and for policies that help people more than corporations. Does that mean she's taken a vow of poverty? No. Or that she can't like, want, or have nice things? No. Or that she can't work hard and buy what she likes? No.
What socialism has she advocated for? Let alone any change which would impact owning a Tesla or apartment?Is she gonna keep the Tesla and luxury apartment if we implement her Socialism?
Socialism is socialism? They can put a Democratic spin on it all they want but at the end of the day it's government power over the people that has historically (and modernly) lead to massive corruption, famine and death.What socialism has she advocated for? Let alone any change which would impact owning a Tesla or apartment?
Please show me where she advocated for socialism?Socialism is socialism? They can put a Democratic spin on it all they want but at the end of the day it's government power over the people that has historically (and modernly) lead to massive corruption, famine and death.
I don't feel like that's something I need to confirm about for her since it's a pretty known fact. A simple Google search will clear that up for you.Please show me where she advocated for socialism?
So you can't. Then I'll assume she hasn't.I don't feel like that's something I need to confirm about for her since it's a pretty known fact. A simple Google search will clear that up for you.
OkSo you can't. Then I'll assume she hasn't.
I don't get it. So, she is for green values and for policies that help people more than corporations. Does that mean she's taken a vow of poverty? No. Or that she can't like, want, or have nice things? No. Or that she can't work hard and buy what she likes? No.
Capitalism isn't about rewarding hard work.
We already have massive corruption and one in 10 households facing food insecurities under capitalism. Enacting a few socialist policies isn't going to lead to the bread lines everyone scares you on.Socialism is socialism? They can put a Democratic spin on it all they want but at the end of the day it's government power over the people that has historically (and modernly) lead to massive corruption, famine and death.
Absolutely, it is! Conversely, Socialism et al, is about carving out capital from the capital capitalists earn!
the 1950's called, they want their scarey words back.
We already have massive corruption and one in 10 households facing food insecurities under capitalism. Enacting a few socialist policies isn't going to lead to the bread lines everyone scares you on.
We cemented our banana republic status on January 6, 2021. The continued refusal to accept the election results only doubles down on our new status going forward……Im not sure what we’re pretending this two party failed experiment is, but it’s not capitalism, or socialism. A few more years down this path though and I think it’ll be safe to call it a banana republic.
Because it's the same argument that I have with ANY politician. I don't think it should be a career. I don't see how they can represent the people when they eventually lose touch with what it's like to BE one of the people. How many people do you know who make that much money? Term limits should exist and I think once a politician has to consider constantly running for re-election, they stop serving the people and they start serving themselves. If you couldn't afford an expensive car or house BEFORE you became a politician, you damn sure shouldn't be able to afford an expensive car or house BECAUSE you became a politician. People shouldn't become wealthy because they became civil servants.
Wasn't Lenin a Communist?The goal of Socialism is Communism
- Vladimir Lenin
I don't like term limits either. I don't like anyone telling me who I cannot vote for as long as they meet reasonable standards.I really dislike term limits.
And truly I do not mean this as a Tump take, but as an example: You need career politicians and civil servants, just like you need career lawyers and doctors and auto mechanics. Having a guy like Trump, who knew nothing about how government works, was disastrous. Lethal actually. Like or dislike Biden, at least he knows how to pull the reins of government. That's because he's been in it his whole adult life.
If politicians don't get paid well you'll never have enough capable politicians to do anything good.Because it's the same argument that I have with ANY politician. I don't think it should be a career. I don't see how they can represent the people when they eventually lose touch with what it's like to BE one of the people. How many people do you know who make that much money? Term limits should exist and I think once a politician has to consider constantly running for re-election, they stop serving the people and they start serving themselves. If you couldn't afford an expensive car or house BEFORE you became a politician, you damn sure shouldn't be able to afford an expensive car or house BECAUSE you became a politician. People shouldn't become wealthy because they became civil servants.
This is false.Absolutely, it is! Conversely, Socialism et al, is about carving out capital from the capital capitalists earn!