Religion Muslims getting their kicks

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Really??? Lmao




thank you



you say you are a bigot to theism, including Muslims no? Muslims are a what makes Arabs just like Judism is what makes Jews Jews.


Yep, just like I can use Stalin as the generalized ideology of atheists.


why would I be but hurt about you brining up Fox News? I don't even watch it!!! Hahaha

The funny thing is you've used Fox News a lot in political debates with Barfo. Maybe it's you that is butt hurt?

Fool, I wasn't engaged in any discussion with MARIS61.

I say you have a reading comprehension problem and you keep proving me right. Maybe if I bold the text you might read it and it might sink in.

I suspected no such thing.

I did respond to MarAzul. His logic is only slightly worse than yours.

As far as comprehension goes, do you not get the difference between respecting Muslims and defending Islam?

Way over your head, apparently.

Muslims are people like you and I. Get it? They're not some monolithic bunch of Islamofascists, as Fox News would call them.
 
Anyway, it's pretty obvious your intent in this thread. You are just a argumentative bigot that can't feel alive unless you are constantly fighting with those that aren't on your same side. It's like every other thread, be it political, religious or even sports related. Then you claim you've won, when most the time you get smacked around.

It's really a sad case buddy and I feel sorry for you. I hope one day you can learn from your faults and grow as a human being. Live is much lovelier when you aren't filled with such racism, bigotry and hate.
 
I don't hate anyone, mags. I respect people, even Muslims - that's the difference between myself and too many Christians.

Another comprehension problem.
 
Fool, I wasn't engaged in any discussion with MARIS61.

You responded to this quote of mine no?

So what's your point? Do you read anything in what I've said that proclaims Muslims are all evil? Talk to your atheist brother that started this thread.

I say you have a reading comprehension problem and you keep proving me right. Maybe if I bold the text you might read it and it might sink in.

Weird, it seems my quote and your response, then this current response only explains your lack of reading comprehension
 
I love you Mags, but I don't think you could be more wrong on this point if you tried.
i know many Muslims that disagree. They consider themselves Muslims as a nation. A nation is just like one calling themselves African or French no?
 
You responded to this quote of mine no?





Weird, it seems my quote and your response, then this current response only explains your lack of reading comprehension


You keep proving you aren't reading or understanding what's written.

you say you are a bigot to theism, including Muslims no? Muslims are a what makes Arabs just like Judism is what makes Jews Jews.

I'll bold it again, and understand the part you don't comprehend:

As far as comprehension goes, do you not get the difference between respecting Muslims and defending Islam?
 
You keep proving you aren't reading or understanding what's written.
No I understand what you are trying to say. You are saying you aren't arguing with Maris, who started this thread, instead arguing with marazul later.

But what you missed was what I said to you. This was started by an atheist and a theist didn't even start arguing until you instigated with your anti-Christian bigotry.

So your response has no relevance to my post because a theist didn't start this war, you did.


I'll bold it again, and understand the part you don't comprehend:

As far as comprehension goes, do you not get the difference between respecting Muslims and defending Islam?

Do you? It doesn't seem that way in this thread or any other for that matter
 
No I understand what you are trying to say. You are saying you aren't arguing with Maris, who started this thread, instead arguing with marazul later.

But what you missed was what I said to you. This was started by an atheist and a theist didn't even start arguing until you instigated with your anti-Christian bigotry.

So your response has no relevance to my post because a theist didn't start this war, you did.




Do you? It doesn't seem that way in this thread or any other for that matter

Bullshit.

My first post and the post I responded to. I was generally agreeing with BC about how the dominant religions evolve over time.

upload_2015-1-22_10-17-5.png
 
i know many Muslims that disagree. They consider themselves Muslims as a nation. A nation is just like one calling themselves African or French no?
Sure, many do. But if you're going to brand someone a racist, it's important to be precise with definitions. To be Arabic is ethnicity. To be Islamic is religion. There are hundreds of millions of Muslims in Indonesia, in India, and in Persian countries like Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, none of which are of Arabic ethnicity.

Also, others of Jewish ethnicity on this board have vehemently denied the claim that religion is a defining characteristic of Jewish-ness. Judaism is a religion, but being Jewish is based on biology, not spirituality.
 
Sure, many do. But if you're going to brand someone a racist, it's important to be precise with definitions. To be Arabic is ethnicity. To be Islamic is religion. There are hundreds of millions of Muslims in Indonesia, in India, and in Persian countries like Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, none of which are of Arabic ethnicity.

Also, others of Jewish ethnicity on this board have vehemently denied the claim that religion is a defining characteristic of Jewish-ness. Judaism is a religion, but being Jewish is based on biology, not spirituality.

Yeah, that Muhammed Ali fellow was a violent arab terrorist.
/greenfont
 
Bullshit.

My first post and the post I responded to. I was generally agreeing with BC about how the dominant religions evolve over time.

View attachment 4661
Instigation buddy. Weird how you don't see that...

It would be no different than if I posted a video of an atheist spray painting "God is dead", then Marazul saying "Stalin murdered so many in the name of their atheistic belief".

He would know that would instigate an argument with probably you and many other atheists.
 
Instigation buddy. Weird how you don't see that...

It would be no different than if I posted a video of an atheist spray painting "God is dead", then Marazul saying "Stalin murdered so many in the name of their atheistic belief".

He would know that would instigate an argument with probably you and many other atheists.

My post was both an observation and demonstrably true. Stands up to scrutiny. Weird how you don't see that.

I basically said that there is a violent period in the evolution of both religions. Get it?
 
Sure, many do. But if you're going to brand someone a racist, it's important to be precise with definitions. To be Arabic is ethnicity. To be Islamic is religion. There are hundreds of millions of Muslims in Indonesia, in India, and in Persian countries like Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, none of which are of Arabic ethnicity.

Also, others of Jewish ethnicity on this board have vehemently denied the claim that religion is a defining characteristic of Jewish-ness. Judaism is a religion, but being Jewish is based on biology, not spirituality.

That makes sense. So he's just a bigot and prejudice.

I stand corrected
 
So does Stalin murderin get hundreds of millions. What's your point. Your intent was to instigate

Fool,

Stalin murdered in the name of socialism, not in the name of atheism.

You simply are not in command of the facts. You've tried this ploy over and over and keep getting trounced over it.
 
Fool,

Stalin murdered in the name of socialism, not in the name of atheism.

You simply are not in command of the facts. You've tried this ploy over and over and keep getting trounced over it.

I rest my case...
 
Lol I guess you didn't read it but I'll give u one more chance

LOL, I know you didn't read it.

Maybe you should and get back to me. Or quote which part of it you think is relevant for whatever point you've already failed to make.
 
But this is just another example of an atheist that will generalize an entire belief on actions of a few, yet defend their very own ideology by not accepting their own peers have been just as guilty
 
Did you read this part, mags?

upload_2015-1-22_10-43-54.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-1-22_10-43-22.png
    upload_2015-1-22_10-43-22.png
    55.2 KB · Views: 4
LOL, I know you didn't read it.

Maybe you should and get back to me. Or quote which part of it you think is relevant for whatever point you've already failed to make.
Oh I will, but I'm giving you a chance to read it and make the case.

So you are saying that Stalin used socialism and had no interest with doing away with religion? That he never made speeches to the people of the republic to do away with religion?
 
Oh I will, but I'm giving you a chance to read it and make the case.

So you are saying that Stalin used socialism and had no interest with doing away with religion, even making speeches to the people of the republic to do away with religion?

I think he made a futile effort to spread Marxism, but gave up on it. His mass murders were inspired by politics and maintaining power, not for reasons of exterminating religion.

As my recent quote of your link clearly supports.

The problem with socialism is you have to kill all the rich people who won't voluntarily participate.
 
And the problem of your Stalin gambit is that he may have been atheist but the soldiers who carried out his agenda were Christians of the Russian Orthodox variety.
 
Okay buddy here you go...

Bezbozhnik_u_stanka_22-1929.jpg
 
What does that prove?

Just wow.

upload_2015-1-22_10-54-36.png

OMG, there was an atheist magazine.
 
The USSR anti-religious campaign of 1928–1941 was a new phase of anti-religious persecution in the Soviet Union following the anti-religious campaign of 1921–1928. The campaign began in 1929, with the drafting of new legislation that severely prohibited religious activities and called for a heightened attack on religion in order to further disseminate atheism. This had been preceded in 1928 at the fifteenth party congress, where Joseph Stalincriticized the party for failure to produce more active and persuasive anti-religious propaganda. This new phase coincided with the beginning of the forced mass collectivization of agriculture and the nationalization of the few remaining private enterprises.
 
The main target of the anti-religious campaign in the 1920s and 1930s was the Russian Orthodox Church, which had the largest number of faithful. Nearly all of its clergy, and many of its believers, were shot or sent to labour camps. Theological schools were closed, and church publications were prohibited.[1] More than 85,000 Orthodox priests were shot in 1937 alone.[2] Only a twelfth of the Russian Orthodox Church's priests were left functioning in their parishes by 1941.[3]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top