MarAzul
LongShip
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 21,370
- Likes
- 7,281
- Points
- 113
ot what do you think about Sly and Riverman
And my reply projected nothing about this duo.
Perhaps the missing logic was implied.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ot what do you think about Sly and Riverman
see your quotes....one of Sly's and one of mine....and your post that they don't deserve a response.....it's not difficult ...own your snark if you are going to project it...better yet...express your own thoughts on NATO as I suggested..you tend to wander off topic and single out people with these snippets of condescension...it's a pattern...And my reply projected nothing about this duo.
Perhaps the missing logic was implied.
I know this. My point is, every nation should be spending at the same rate to keep the Alliance fair and balanced.

I did. NATO is enabling us. If you want to continue letting our government run roughshod be my guest.Who voted for "NATO is hurting the U.S."?
Please defend that.
I did. NATO is enabling us. If you want to continue letting our government run roughshod be my guest.
Who voted for "NATO is hurting the U.S."?
Please defend that.
I didn't vote, but that voter would obviously answer you:
Because of the alliance, the U.S. pays at least a hundred billion dollars that Europe would have to pay to defend itself.
Could you fill in some blanks here? Enabling us to do what? Run roughshod over what?
Can you see any unintended consequences if NATO stops enabling us?
barfo
What if Germany, for example, had a very large military instead of relying on the US for defense. Can you think of any possible downsides to that?
barfo
What if Germany, for example, had a very large military instead of relying on the US for defense. Can you think of any possible downsides to that?
The US paying for most of it keeps the US as the dominant power in the world and the world reserve currency.It’s a good thing but other countries do need to pay their fair share. I don’t think that’s a bad thing to bring up.
Oil pipeline ends there ...US had military missile bases there as well...strategic country for containing Russia's Navy from entering the Mediterranean or getting to the Suez Canal although they now have Syrian ports for their navy ...they couldn't re-supply them with the strait blocked.Can someone please explain to my why Turkey is even part of NATO?
I am familiar with that, I guess I meant in regards to them rejecting Finland and Sweden joining. Why are they acting in Russias interest here.Oil pipeline ends there ...US had military missile bases there as well...strategic country for containing Russia's Navy from entering the Mediterranean or getting to the Suez Canal although they now have Syrian ports for their navy ...they couldn't re-supply them with the strait blocked.
The North Sea is their other access port to the Atlantic...Scandinavia can block that access as well as Turkey can block the southern access...Russia is pretty landlocked...Turkey makes no political sense other than justifying their own genocide against the Kurds....that govt is really fucked up so hard to say why they want Russian goodwill...a Russian diplomat was poisoned in Turkey I believe not long ago. Turkey is another country that pines for it's lost Ottoman empire days. These dictators are huddling up it seems.I am familiar with that, I guess I meant in regards to them rejecting Finland and Sweden joining. Why are they acting in Russias interest here.
I am familiar with that, I guess I meant in regards to them rejecting Finland and Sweden joining. Why are they acting in Russias interest here.