NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2 (Merged)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

There's no way Faried will fall to #21. I hope Chad & Co. are planning on trading up!
Why do you say this? Besides NY at 17, I don't really think a whole lot of teams have him high on their list, or have bigger/more important needs to deal with.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Why do you say this? Besides NY at 17, I don't really think a whole lot of teams have him high on their list, or have bigger/more important needs to deal with.

Faried is a better player/prospect than most of the projected late lotto-mid first round picks. IMO a GM would be a fool to pick Markieff Morris, Tobias Harris, Chris Singleton, Jordan Hamilton over Faried.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Faried is a better player/prospect than most of the projected late lotto-mid first round picks. IMO a GM would be a fool to pick Markieff Morris, Tobias Harris, Chris Singleton, Jordan Hamilton over Faried.

A lot of the guys you just listed are apples to Faried's orange. If a GM is looking at the players you mentioned along with Faried for the same role then he's absolutely a fool!

I anticipate this draft will be a lot more about individual team needs, wants, and likes (ie. players they fall in love with) rather than your typical "Player X is clearly more talented than Player Y therefor they get drafted in that order " draft...

Don't be shocked to see some guys get drafted WAY higher than people are expecting - guys like Jeremy Tyler, Nicola Vucevic, Josh Selby, etc.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

[video=youtube;HIQY5m5hnj8]

Called the best shooter in the draft "by far" his range is bordering on amazing/horrific shot selection.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

[video=youtube;HIQY5m5hnj8]

Called the best shooter in the draft "by far" his range is bordering on amazing/horrific shot selection.


LOL, I've had an eye on this guy, he was 21 for 21 in one of the combine shooting drills and even his athleticism surprised many with some nice combine numbers. However I have no idea how he plays but you have to at least take a look at a shooter like that.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I watched Goudelock against UNC this year. He was lights out. Kinda reminds me of Eddie House.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I'm going purely off of youtube highlights but I've been saying for weeks that this guy has INSANE offensive skills. So far Kanter, Valanciunas, Biyombo, and Vesely have been seen as easily better by most sources. Donatas seems like a fucking TERRIBLE defender/ rebounder but shit look at that offensive game. Athletic 7 footer with excellent footwork, gorgeous fluidity (Valanciunas on the other hand looks stiff and mechanical), finishes with both hands (Kanter had zero left hand at Nike hoop summit and I have a hard time believing hes become ambidextrous in a year-year and a half), can dribble drive on big guys, shoot out to 3 pt range, score in the post. Even if he becomes Andrea Bargnani that's a good pick considering where most mock's have him projected. If he fills out and rebounds a little better who's to say he doesn't become a Rasheed type of guy (less defense) as far as ability to score from all over the court.

Agreed. I'm sold on him after watching a whole bunch of videos of him on Youtube. He looks like a Yi clone, but with a 3pt shot and a slightly better post game. I don't understand how we can just pass over this caliber of talent for a guy that goes by on just effort (and only one redeemable skill in rebounding) in Faried. And he wears #11 and is from Lithuania. That historical perspective is just too enticing.

ANNNDD, he'd add to our growing international roster.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

David Locke's scouting vids are very informative:

[video=youtube;9H3A3_7Hq7w]
.
[video=youtube;kaqjvJwrd8w]
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Highlight videos are just that. My sons little league team made a highlight video of each kid this season. My son, who is good, but great looked like the second coming of Joe freakin DiMaggio in those highlights.

As for the draft, Faried would be a nice pick, but if that's all they do on draft day it will be a failure.
As for the best shooter in the draft, we got that last year, and look what that got us.
I like Valanciunas better than Motiejunas, but they both remind me of Sabas when they play (not as good obviously, but just their style) ...Motiejunas would be awesome in an uptempo motion type offense....so not here.
 
Last edited:
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Givoni was on David Locke's radio show today and said that Donatas should be the clear-cut #1 pick but he held himself back by coasting a lot. The 'doesn't love the game' talk surrounding him sounds like it has some substance to it. Though, I'd still trade up for him if we had the chance.

I dunno: players like that are only useful if they're scoring. He's not going to stop ANYBODY and he doesn't rebound. And I have a feeling he'd be easy to stop scoring (just stick a goon on him to intimidate him). Look at Yi, who Chad Ford rated as high as anyone in his draft. And Yi can actually rebound (at least in international tournaments). Give me a Ben Wallace over a Nikoloz Tskitishvili any day.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Just watched all those David Locke videos (bad case of insomnia...), really makes you realize how crappy this draft is. Totally agree with him about not getting the Valanciunas hype. Guy looks like a STIFF and hes supposed to go in the top 4. He put up pretty decent numbers in Europe but man its hard to see THAT guy doing much in the NBA. Looks a lot like Hamed Haddadi body wise and how he moves. Probably a couple inches shorter though.

Even Derrick Williams looks like nothing more than an average NBA player. Al Harrington's scoring with Lamar Odom's rebounding.

I'm almost glad as a Warriors fan that we have the 11th pick. You've got guys floating in that range like Burks, Biyombo, Tristan Thompson, Donatas who aren't in the top 10 for whatever reason but they've got better upside than a lot of the guys who will be taken ahead of them.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

SethDavisHoops

Been watching vid of Andrew Goudelock on Synergy. His skills won't translate well to NBA. Not big, not explosive, not a playmaker.

Which is why he's projected a mid-late second rounder.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I like Vucevic's skill set when it comes to shooting and he seems to have a decent array of post moves, but his athletic numbers were pretty "blech" which makes me think he's not going to be much a defender at the next level. Whatever, if we draft him, so be it, he couldn't be any worse than Chris Johnson or Earl Barron.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Here's one player who, when with Washington, was asked to convert to SF because he stood only 6'6" - Ben Wallace.

Another problem is Wallace's height . . .

"I'm small. I'm 6'6"/ 6'7"," admitted Wallace.

Ever wonder how teams missed Ben Wallace? I did. From what I can tell it was fairly simple. Wallace measured at 6'7 in pre-draft workouts. Teams looked at that and thought, "That's small forward size?" When you look at Wallace as a small forward you see a good defender who might lack quickness and definitely lacks the ability to shoot from outside of 8 feet. Of course in reality Wallace didn't have small forward size. People don't block shots or shoot with the top of their head, they do it with their hands, usually while jumping. Wallace's long arms and great leaping ability allowed him to play like he's 6'10, not ideal size for a center, but definitely reasonable. Four Defensive Player of the Year awards later teams have realized that it is more important how tall someone plays than how tall they measure.

Faried is very similar with his 9'0" standing reach and 11'11" max vertical reach allowing him to play much bigger than his 6'7.5" height.

He's also a player Faried looks up to:

"Ben Wallace stuck in the league because he was able to block shots, rebound and be a great defensive presence," Faried said. "He started for the Pistons, won championships (sic) and made All-Star teams. I fully expect I can be able to do that, but it's going to take time and progress. I'm just going to keep getting better every day."

Wallace has also been recognized as the NBA's top defensive player four times, an honor Faried covets.

"Yes, that's a great goal of mine," Faried said. "I fully expect to some year become the Defensive Player of the Year."
 
Last edited:
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I like Vucevic's skill set when it comes to shooting and he seems to have a decent array of post moves, but his athletic numbers were pretty "blech" which makes me think he's not going to be much a defender at the next level. Whatever, if we draft him, so be it, he couldn't be any worse than Chris Johnson or Earl Barron.

I wonder what Dirks athletic numbers were?

Just sayin...
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I think if Vucevic was playing overseas he'd be a lotto pick. Playing college ball hurt his stock.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

NBAdraft.net updated their mock today with a new #1 pick:

Enes Kanter

o0
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

NBAdraft.net updated their mock today with a new #1 pick:
Enes Kanter
o0

Yeah, I saw that. They've also dropped Valanciunas because they believe he'll withdraw. Their reasoning is that Cleveland might not see much difference between Irving and Knight, but think that if they take a PG at 1 they won't get value at 4. So if they take the big man at 1, they're sure to get one of the PGs at 4. Seems vaguely plausible, but others use that as an argument for taking Williams at #1 and have Kanter dropping.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I like Vucevic's skill set when it comes to shooting and he seems to have a decent array of post moves, but his athletic numbers were pretty "blech" which makes me think he's not going to be much a defender at the next level. Whatever, if we draft him, so be it, he couldn't be any worse than Chris Johnson or Earl Barron.

I was just coming here to talk about Vucevic. He's a very unsexy pick, but at the same time, he could actually fill a need. Plus, he's only 20 - he's actually a month younger than Motiejunas and around 50lbs heavier! I really like his skill set: he's a *great* rebounder, a very good shooter and has nice post moves. I actually have a feeling he might go before our pick, because big men tend to go up the draft on draft day.

Another thing about Vucevic: everyone points to his paltry vertical, but his footspeed isn't that bad: he has the same agility number (12.02) as LaMarcus (Joe Johnson was 12.05), and identical sprint time (3.27) to Greg Oden.... and Brandon Roy!

I'm sort of resigning myself to Faried being gone by our pick.
 
Last edited:
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Yeah, I saw that. They've also dropped Valanciunas because they believe he'll withdraw. Their reasoning is that Cleveland might not see much difference between Irving and Knight, but think that if they take a PG at 1 they won't get value at 4. So if they take the big man at 1, they're sure to get one of the PGs at 4. Seems vaguely plausible, but others use that as an argument for taking Williams at #1 and have Kanter dropping.

They Cavs can't seriously think that there's no difference between Knight and Irving? Irving is a pure setup man and Knight is a total combo guard. But I guess if they can live with Kanter-Knight over Irving-??? I guess that's their prerogative.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

[video=youtube;rDqJGJwAU0M]

I don't think they could have come up with a worse drill for him to do. Can you imagine how Ben Wallace would look during short/mid-range shooting drills?

Btw, his official measurements are insane:

6'8" w/o shoes
7'6" wingspan
9'4" standing reach (identical to Oden)
245 lbs (4.2% body fat)
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Wow... I don't think I've ever seen an NBA prospect that is so bad at simple basketball things. He doesn't move like a basketball player either.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

God awful showing by him. Those measurements are crazy though. Here's a post I made on another forum comparing him to some similarly sized NBA C's (and Udoh and Favors, Udoh because I posted it on a GSW forum and Favors for reference since hes kind of a similar prospect to Bismack):

"Tweet from DX: "Measurements just handed out here at the EuroCamp. Bismack Biyombo 6-8 w/out shoes, 7-6 wingspan, 9-4 standing reach, 245 lbs, 4.2% body fat"

Horford: 6'8.75" w/o shoes, 7'0.75 wingspan, 8'11 standing reach, 246 lbs., 9.1% body fat.

Okafor: 6'8.75 w/o shoes, 7'4 wingspan, 9'2.5 standing reach, 257 lbs, n/a body fat

Jefferson: 6'8.5 w/o shoes, 7'2.5 wingspan, 9'2 standing reach, 263 lbs, n/a body fat

Udoh: 6'8.75 w/o shoes, 7'4.5 wingspan, 8'10.5 standing reach, 237 lbs, 8.0% body fat

Derrick Favors: 6'8.75 w/o shoes, 7'4 wingspan, 9'2 standing reach, 245 lbs, 6.5% body fat

Dwight Howard: 6'9 w/o shoes, 7'4.5 wingspan, 9'3.5 standing reach, 240 lb, n/a body fat

All these measurements were taken pre-draft mind you. Howard, Horford and Okafor have been legit starting C's. Al Jefferson started for a few years at C. Udoh and Favors are natural PFs IMO but can play C for stretches or maybe permanently if they put on weight.

Some things that jump out at you when looking at these. Firstly, Bismack is shorter than all of them by 0.5-1 inch. That said, his 9'4 standing reach trumps them all. Looking at the standing reach of some 7 footers, I see Oden has an identical 9'4 standing reach, B. Lopez has a 9'5 standing reach, Bogut has a 9'2.5 standing reach.

Secondly, his 245 lbs. is identical to Horford and Favors coming out of college. Both had higher body fat % and Horford was a couple years older. He's heavier than Udoh and Dwight entering the draft. His 4.1% body fat is insanely low. The guy really is all muscle. If he really is 18 then its pretty damn impressive that he's got 5 lbs of probably pure muscle more than a similarly-aged Dwight. And hes an inch shorter but measured out with a slightly taller standing reach.

The youtube vids lead you to believe that hes a more explosive athlete than all of them except Dwight. At 245 lbs hes got a ways to go before he catches up with guys like Okafor or Jefferson. Dwight has put on plenty of weight since his rookie year and Horford has surely added lbs too. But if you're of the belief that he can add another 15-20 lbs., which doesn't seem completely unreasonable, then he can probably hang bulk-wise at C. As far as length, he beats out all these 6'10ish C's and is up there with the 7 footers.

There is assuredly risk with this guy but also a lot of potential. If you believe in standing reach and that his frame can carry more weight then you'd probably believe he could play C like a Ben Wallace. Athletically, if hes on par with Dwight but only an inch shorter would that still be good enough to play C in the NBA? He'd be nuts at PF but just flat out doesn't have the skill."
---------------

I always thought the Ben Wallace comparisons were nuts but his freakish body actually makes me believe it a bit more. Hes got the tools to actually be an impact C like Ben was at a small size. I'm not sure but I do think Ben played basketball his whole life though so although he was utterly skill-less on offense you can't assume that Biyombo will have the same instincts, IQ, etc. that Ben had on defense and rebounding. That said, Bismack was good enough to play 17 mpg in ACB league. For those not familiar with it, the ACB league is pretty much unanimously considered the second best basketball league in the world. Euros are also tremendously seniority-based so its impressive that he was able to get 17 mpg as an (alleged) 18 year old. He put up 6.4 ppg, 5.1 rpg, and 2.3 bpg which is pretty good production for 17 minutes a game. Like I said, you can't assume that he has the brain Ben Wallace had but hes also producing at the highest level outside the NBA as opposed to a guy like Mohuammed Saer Sene who (if memory serves) only played in some low level dutch league or something like that.

Ben Wallace is still a best case type of scenario but its not completely insane to think this guy could be a decent C. Hes got a taller standing reach than most NBA C's. Like I said above, same as Oden's, higher than Boguts, higher than Tyson Chandler's. Hes a Ben Wallace type athlete. Right now Bismack doesn't have the bulk of a Ben Wallace but he does have the freakish all-muscle-no-fat physique and looks like he can add weight.

He looked god awful finishing in that video, however. Centers can be terrible offensive players in the NBA. Look at Chandler, Perkins, Joel Anthony, Okafor, Ben Wallace, etc. That said, I bet those guys would all do much better in the drills than Bismack did. I know hes just an 18 year old and only been at it a few years but damn, its his full time job and he can't even hit an open baby hook from 2 feet out? That's pretty awful.

All in all I still think hes worth a shot in the 6-12 pick range. I'd be happy if my Warriors drafted him. Hes a boom or bust pick. He seems to have some rebounding and defensive instincts and he seems like a guy who plays with passion. If the background check says hes 18 and a hard worker then hes a nice gamble to take.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Travis freaking Outlaw was more polished coming into the NBA than that kid. Hell no.

People that can actually play the game is nice.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Travis freaking Outlaw was more polished coming into the NBA than that kid. Hell no.

People that can actually play the game is nice.

I think scouts have a longer attention span and wont be deterred from this workout as they all know his skillset is rather limited to just defense and rebounding. Something is seriously wrong with your offense if you even think of running an ISO for this kind of player.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Travis freaking Outlaw was more polished coming into the NBA than that kid. Hell no.

People that can actually play the game is nice.

Like I said, he played 17 mpg in the second best league in the world and put up 6/5/2. He must be doing something right.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top