<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kk30 @ Aug 10 2008, 11:32 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Look where he is playing...The whole team plays below average defense therefore players look like defensive liabilities, i.e. Amare. Have you ever watched a D'Antoni interview when asked about defense? He deflects the question or answers it with a statement about offense. You can't blame Amare for poor team defense.
(Steve Nash and Mike D'ntoni are not defensive minded, Shaq is too old and slow to help much, and Leondro Barbosa and Raja Bell only work the perimeter)</div>
You realize this argument has serious flaws, don't you? First off, you talk about the team and Amare as if they're entirely separate entities. Also, the fact that there are other defensive liabilities on the roster doesn't say anything one way or the other about him specifically. And Shaq's arrival pushed him to pf, where he's supposed to be better.
Edit: Just looking through some box scores- he actually is better once he moves to the 4, in terms of opponents' performances. Not great, but much better. But, still, the point was that he's worse than Garnett. Which I assume he don't have to argue about?