- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,409
- Likes
- 43,895
- Points
- 113
Actually, he walked. Wasn't willing to be dictated to by a non-sports-fan boss to talk less Blazers.Getting fired from your shitty radio show.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, he walked. Wasn't willing to be dictated to by a non-sports-fan boss to talk less Blazers.Getting fired from your shitty radio show.....
Actually, he walked. Wasn't willing to be dictated to by a non-sports-fan boss to talk less Blazers.
Yeah, which he expected them to do because he put his impending departure out on twitter before talking to them. He forced their hand, and forced them to pay out the entirety of his remaining contract rather than leaving money on the table.Wasn't the story that he wanted to leave in a few months and they said, how about you leave now..... like...... right now?
Olshey's issue is that he has a skewed perspective when it comes to value. He seems to understand value when bringing in players. But when he is sending out players he over values them. He thinks they are worth more than they are, and other teams aren't buying it.
Yeah, because you know everything that he's offered etc etc etc. Safe to say that Neal's pinky toe knows more about NBA talent than you do.
There are a half-dozen posters here who are clearly paid to defend Blazer management. I have the Polaroids. Year after year, whenever anyone calls for a change, the same people show up in the threads. It all starts at the top with Denny. Follow the money.
Kings could be worse off... They could be losing that dominant player for no compensation. Like we did a couple years ago...No matter what NO does it coudl be worse, we could be the kings and give away our franchise talent for a kick in the nuts and a donut.
Kings could be worse off... They could be losing that dominant player for no compensation. Like we did a couple years ago...
Going after free agents was stupid. Losing Aldridge for nothing was stupid. Aside from those two items I think he's done a pretty good job.Having watched the Bulls for all those years, I've seen my share of incompetent GMs, and downright bad people. Compared to those guys, NO is incredible. He just made a mid-season trade, something the Bulls have done on very rare occasion.
Given all the cap space in the world, none of the top FAs signed here. It wasn't for lack of money. It wasn't for lack of as good a sales pitch as anyone here could make. It is what it is. Big name FAs didn't sign in Chicago, either.
NO also gets to meet these players we only know as trading cards or see on TV. He has to judge how much of a cancer the guys are, how their paychecks would affect the attitude of the guys on our roster, how losing guys on our roster affect morale, etc.
What I did learn from watching the Bulls operate is how you build a winning team (they had lots of winning records). Luck into a DRose (we have Dame, who's actually about the same, and we have CJ). Keep your draft picks and keep signing those guys except for the guys that utterly fail (see Marquis Teague or Tony Snell). I also learned how you maneuver under the CBA rules, avoiding the LT.
I wish NO could snap his fingers and trade our 2nd round draft pick for a superstar who won't destroy the team morale, but I'm a realist.
Every single move he's made has been text book.
About the only thing to do at this point is to change coaches. A new coach who will get the guys playing defense.
If you don't have the talent to win based on talent, you will win if you play elite defense.
Your analogy doesn't even apply as the concept of investment is completely different. In this case the guy paying the $$$ out authorized the financial expenditure. So while you seem completely intent on blaming Olshey exclusively that's misguided as Paul, again the guy financing the whole thing approved everything.So if the market value for a Maserati is $500,000, you'll go into debt one summer to buy it, then in February when you can't pay the sales tax, cry, "But it was market value!"
The fact that someone paid "market value" is irrelevant if it exceeds his budget.
And if we won 50 games but Paul Allen had to pay the $30M luxury tax next season, I guarantee that at least one person would care, negating your statement.
Where do I sign up? Is the pay by the post, by the word or what?There are a half-dozen posters here who are clearly paid to defend Blazer management. I have the Polaroids. Year after year, whenever anyone calls for a change, the same people show up in the threads. It all starts at the top with Denny. Follow the money.
Neil has better hair than I do.
And I hate him for that.
Hate.
All do respect to you boo boo er Bo Bo!! I wouldn't bet on that.
As fans we have to live with it. But his roster is not ok right now. No matter how much hot air comes out of his mouth. It doesn't make ok where his team and roster is at the moment. How many times have we said, "we'll just wait til the summer" or ""we'll wait for the deadline" for him to make his splash. The man is absent. He is no longer even good at keeping the comraderie together for the team.
He's just bad. And doesn't need anymore of his own excuses or yours or mine to story tell what is going on. Someone else needs an opportunity to get this roster where he can't take it.

I guess it was him being a restricted free agent, which means he would not have been a trade asset, so why get him.I guess I can't blame this on Olshey because I guess 28 other GM's passed, but I just read some more details on the Noel trade. That Dallas first round pick is so protected it will most likely to morph into 2 2nd round picks. So two second round picks plus a guy who I wouldn't consider any better prospect than Vonleh, in fact he has lower shooting % from both 2 and 3. I just don't get this. I mean maybe he wouldn't fit with us now but just as a trade asset?
I guess I can't blame this on Olshey because I guess 28 other GM's passed, but I just read some more details on the Noel trade. That Dallas first round pick is so protected it will most likely to morph into 2 2nd round picks. So two second round picks plus a guy who I wouldn't consider any better prospect than Vonleh, in fact he has lower shooting % from both 2 and 3. I just don't get this. I mean maybe he wouldn't fit with us now but just as a trade asset?
IMO last summer saw the height of ridiculous contracts and unfortunately we did way too much. I think we are going to see more sober deals this summer as compared to last"Market value" is set by the market, in this case the half-dozen GMs who paid double the usual last summer. Olshey was one of that small group. He was a large part of setting the new market values.
If 15 Pintos are on sale in the summer, and I offer $17.5M for one, and a tiny number of other GMs do the same, claiming that now, this is the new market price, thus making their own statement true...it's a lie to claim the next February, "But I was forced! I just paid the market value!"
yes it did, and it did for me for yesterday as well. Don't hate NO, just think he made some bad money decisions last summer but what we don't know is how much that was or was not influenced by PA?Nurk's game last night seemed to take people's minds off the N.O. hate and trade deadline meltdowns. Haha.
![]()
LOL, I think many are just happy we have ONE thing is this clusterfuck of a season to be happy about (Nurk), give us just a moment please and then back to the usual bitching!Man, here it is a day later and I am still swamped with happiness. I am overwhelmed trying to process all of Olshey's achievements yesterday. What a bumblebee of an energy bunny. This calls for 5 more threads to celebrate his greatness. I'm leaving to buy cake candles, one for every trade he made yesterday. Then I'll bake a cake, one layer for every giant step forward from yesterday. You guys stay busy celebrating in this thread.
