- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,116
- Likes
- 10,949
- Points
- 113
I guess it's breaking news right now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A long time enemy of the neo-conservatives is gone. Reagan parties in hell tonight!
his death got less attention than paul walkers, smh
this forum had more discussion about it, and my facebook.
Nelson's was sort of expected. He had been near death about 6 months ago.
A long time enemy of the neo-conservatives is gone. Reagan parties in hell tonight!
and this demonstrates what?
He had his own ideas about ending Apartheid.
You'd think that deliberately choosing a black man to send as our ambassador would be a huge slap in the face to their government.
I wouldn't think that. I would think it was a political concession made by the advice of some PR adviser.
It's not how he tells it. Edwards Perkins.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6369450
In 1986, the Reagan administration made a surprising move. Secretary of State George Schultz called career diplomat Edward Perkins.
"He said, 'There are people around the president who believe that it is time to send a black ambassador,'" recalls Perkins. "He said, 'But not necessarily for the right reasons.'"
Perkins, who was then almost 60, feared that he was being used as a black face to mask the Reagan administration's refusal to get tough with South Africa.
Yeah, it kind of is how he tells it. Did you read the link you posted?
Both.Mandela, good or bad? I simply can't decide
Both.
He freed blacks in South Africa.
And then, effectively, delivered them into mass poverty and unemployment by allowing socialism to be the dominant force.
Too bad.
Yes, I did. He met with Reagan who gave him 100% support behind anything he wanted to do. That's what he's been saying in live interviews.
I'm failing to see Reagan made some sort of mistake in sending him, nor in what Perkins did. Perkins also served in the Clinton administration. Also in the newspaper article, or in the NY Times article about it from 1986, he was the 2nd black man the administration nominated. The first had business dealings with companies in S. Africa so the democrats wouldn't confirm him.
I don't think that's right.
It's more a case of the monied white people fleeing the country with their wealth when apartheid was ended.
And by all accounts I've seen, the economy there was better when he left office than when apartheid was practiced.
He's certainly one of the great leaders in modern history, maybe among the greats of all time.
That doesn't mean Reagan didn't appoint him for "the wrong reasons."
I'm not arguing against any of that. All I said was that Mandela was an enemy of Reagan and the American right wing.
So are you saying that these "monied white people" took the best gold and diamond mines the world has with them?
If a black run government that guaranteed minority rights, supported property rights and contract law, why in hell would "monied white people " leave?
That the above did not happen is on Mandela.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
