GMJ
Suspended
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 12,067
- Likes
- 30
- Points
- 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Joey FistPump @ Apr 16 2008, 11:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The kid actually does have a case...security is within there rights to remove someone who is being violent, drunk, or belligerent; however given what was apparently happening they went over the line.
I'd sue before apologizing for having a banner stating an opinion.</div>
The kid doesn't have a case, based on what was seen in the video. The New Jersey Nets (whoever owns the building) has the right to regulate their property, and kick out people who they deem as disruptive. They can kick out someone for holding up that sign, and they can permanently ban them.
The only case that could be made would be that any significantly unecessary force was used to remove the kid, and based on that video...nothing that would warrant a lawsuit.
I'm sure the kid is angry, I would be too. Still, just because a situation doesn't "sit right" doesn't make it a valid legal case.
I'd sue before apologizing for having a banner stating an opinion.</div>
The kid doesn't have a case, based on what was seen in the video. The New Jersey Nets (whoever owns the building) has the right to regulate their property, and kick out people who they deem as disruptive. They can kick out someone for holding up that sign, and they can permanently ban them.
The only case that could be made would be that any significantly unecessary force was used to remove the kid, and based on that video...nothing that would warrant a lawsuit.
I'm sure the kid is angry, I would be too. Still, just because a situation doesn't "sit right" doesn't make it a valid legal case.