OT Nov 6th prediction time

[MARIS61]

Rick Scott wins, as expected.

 

[MARIS61]

I see one Republican woman and no Black-Americans. Apparently, Trump's new branch of the Republican party did not hear the public's cry for more diversity.

These are the candidates voted to run by the people.

 

[MARIS61]

now Maxine Waters will have the ability to subpoena his tax returns.

There are a myriad of defenses against a subpoena of tax records, including the 5th Amendment.

Waters would better serve her party by DOING SOMETHING POSITIVE/CONSTRUCTIVE FOR AMERICANS FOR A CHANGE.

 

[MARIS61]

There is no LEGITIMATE reason not to release his tax returns unless he has something to hide.

Personal Privacy.

That's the best reason of all, and the only one needed in a Free country.

Your reasoning is that of a dictator.

 

[MARIS61]

Oy vey. You don't need an amendment. Go back to civics class.

You need either a law, or someone (like the last 10 presidents) with integrity. Either would work.

No, it would take an Amendment as a law would be found UnConstitutional.

 

[Lanny]

Rick Scott wins, as expected.

Expected by you.

 

[Lanny]

Personal Privacy.

That's the best reason of all, and the only one needed in a Free country.

Your reasoning is that of a dictator.

We don't expect a lot of "personal privacy" from our Presidents.

 

[Lanny]

These are the candidates voted to run by the people.

By the people of the far Right.

 

[CupWizier]

Personal Privacy.

That's the best reason of all, and the only one needed in a Free country.

Your reasoning is that of a dictator.

Your president wants to be a dictator as just look at the leaders he admires and those he takes issue with. He has had issues with leaders from the free world while praising leaders that are dictators (Russia, North Korea, China, Philippines etc.) Why is that?

 

[CupWizier]

Rick Scott wins, as expected.

Usually when a big (blue) wave hits there will always be a couple of small ripples. Democrats did what was necessary in this election and a building block for 2020.

 

[Lanny]

No, it would take an Amendment as a law would be found UnConstitutional.

Any thoughts on why you think that?

 

[Chris Craig]

Rick Scott wins, as expected.

That's ok

 

[MARIS61]

Usually when a big (blue) wave hits there will always be a couple of small ripples. Democrats did what was necessary in this election and a building block for 2020.

Dems did themselves in as far as Florida goes.

Their election-rigging infrastructure has been exposed and heads will roll and the entire system will be cleansed and re-staffed.

 

[Lanny]

Dems did themselves in as far as Florida goes.

Their election-rigging infrastructure has been exposed and heads will roll and the entire system will be cleansed and re-staffed.

Heads may roll but you're gonna be shocked by which heads roll.

 

[MARIS61]

Any thoughts on why you think that?

Because a law to search the President's tax records would be in violation of The Constitution and therefore invalid.

It is estimated that over half of all laws (including every gun law) in America would/will be overturned as unConstitutional if/when they are reviewed by SCOTUS.

A law pertaining to POTUS would be considered by SCOTUS almost instantaneously.

 

[MARIS61]

Heads may roll but you're gonna be shocked by which heads roll.

Nothing shocks me more than the widespread naivete' of slaves.

 

[Chris Craig]

Dems did themselves in as far as Florida goes.

Their election-rigging infrastructure has been exposed and heads will roll and the entire system will be cleansed and re-staffed.

Cool

 

[Lanny]

Because a law to search the President's tax records would be in violation of The Constitution and therefore invalid.

It is estimated that over half of all laws (including every gun law) in America would/will be overturned as unConstitutional if/when they are reviewed by SCOTUS.

A law pertaining to POTUS would be considered by SCOTUS almost instantaneously.

Two things:
1. Easy to say any law requiring a President or Presidential candidate to reveal his tax returns would be overturned by the Supreme Court and very difficult to explain away;
2. Over half the laws in America would be overturned by the Supreme Court has got to be estimated by crackpots, crackpots whom you have failed to reveal. No fair citing your grandpa and grandma Kettle.

 

[Lanny]

Nothing shocks me more than the widespread naivete' of slaves.

Nothing shocks me more than posts such as this.

Edit: President Trump shocks me every day more than the post I refer to.

 

[MARIS61]

The cleansing begins...

Brenda Snipes, the supervisor of elections in Florida's Broward County, has submitted her resignation, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported Sunday.

The paper reported that Snipes' resignation will take effect in January.

“It is true. She did send it,” Burnadette Norris-Weeks, an attorney for the county's elections office, told the news outlet.

BROWARD COUNTS THE WRONG BALLOTS AS FLORIDA RACES TO FINISH MANUAL RECOUNT AHEAD OF SUNDAY DEADLINE

On Monday, Snipes told reporters that she's worked in the office "for about 15 years, and I have to say this the first time that this office or I have been under such attacks. "There have been issues that haven't gone the way we wanted it. You can call it a mistake or you can call it whatever you want to call it."

On Tuesday, the election official said "it is time to move on" from her role overseeing Broward's elections. And on Saturday, she told The Guardian that racism "probably" played a role in the heated criticism against her. That same day, Snipes also acknowledged that her office had misplaced more than 2,000 ballots during the recount.

Snipes was appointed as the top elections official in Broward County in 2003 by then-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, a Republican. Snipes, a Democrat, has been elected to the role four times since.

But even Bush lost his patience with Snipes, calling for her resignation on Twitter last week after the recount turned into a fiasco.

"There is no question that Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes failed to comply with Florida law on multiple counts, undermining Floridians’ confidence in our electoral process," Bush tweeted. "Supervisor Snipes should be removed from her office following the recounts."

BRENDA SNIPES, BROWARD ELECTIONS OFFICIAL AT CENTER OF BALLOT STORM, HAS HISTORY OF CONTROVERSY

Snipes was a notorious figure in Florida politics long before this year's election drama.

Earlier this year, a state judge ruled that Snipes broke election law by destroying ballots in a 2016 congressional primary race involving Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz without waiting the required 22 months. Also in 2016, a medical marijuana amendment didn't appear on some Broward ballots, and again that year results from primary elections were posted on the office's website before polls had closed.

A week after the 2012 election, about 1,000 uncounted ballots were suddenly discovered. And in 2004, about 58,000 mail-in ballots were not delivered, requiring workers to hurry to replace them.

AFTER DRAMATIC RECOUNTS, MOST FLORIDA OFFICES BELONG TO REPUBLICANS

Just last week, a Broward County judge found that Snipes had violated Florida open records laws by failing to quickly provide voting records to attorneys for Scott's Senate campaign.

More than 8.1 million votes were cast in Florida in the midterm elections. The state is scheduled to certify results in the Senate race — which incumbent Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson conceded to Republican Gov. Rick Scott on Sunday — on Nov. 20.

Fox News' Barnini Chakraborty and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

[MARIS61]

This thread brings back memories...

http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/free-stuff-for-voting.128204/

 

[Lanny]

Rotten elections in Florida?
Or, Millions of invaders taking buses from polling place to polling place and repeatedly voting illegally for Hillary?