<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Big Zee:</div><div class="quote_post">I was a Kidd fan up until the trade from the Suns to the Nets. While I have always been astonished that nobody has taken offense to Kidd's shooting percentage (he shoots the ball worse than Iverson, who does get heat for it), I was able to forgive him up until the Jersey trade. </div>
once again, lets see if this gets through peoples skull about kidds shooting. kidd was never a shooter/scorer. he can put points up and have over the course of his career and his jersey career if you watch the games. plus iverson takes so many shots that his percentage is never going to be great. he has to shoot a lot for philly to win. hes a scorer, he doesnt shoot, philly won't win.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Since then, Jason Kidd has been blatantly overrated. Stephon Marbury was mocked because he couldn't take the same Nets team that made it to the Finals with JKidd to the play-offs. Same team, huh? Bullcrap! 4 of the 5 starters on that team were injured for long stretches during the season with Steph (Kittles did not play all season). When Kidd played there the first season, there were no injuries.</div>
overrated!? you have GOT to be kidding me and everyone else. that shows that you cant even make logical points b/c ur a kidd hater. how can someone be overrated when he help to take a team to its first ever nba finals two years in a row with young players? kmart was only in his 2nd yr and collins and rj were rookies. so please tell me how that is being overrated! i can understand you saying that if he had tim duncan or shaq, but he didnt. he had two young fowards and a new center on that nets team. and since when was steph supposed to take the nets far in the playoffs. i don't recall hearing that the nets team with him was supposed to win the east and go to the finals. he had the players who he had and he made the best of it. if u put steph with that 1st yr team kidd was on(yes there was van horn but thats not saying alot b/c he wasnt the best player at that time), he wouldn't have made them(players and team) better and they wouldnt go far into the playoffs b/c the guys were young and had no experience so steph would try to take over and kmart and rj would never grow. bottom line, kidd is a leader and teacher, steph is not. they are totally different players offensivly and defensivly so you can't compare. but u can tell who is the best pg in the league and who is not.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">So that's been my major reason to hate on Kidd: actually it is to give counterweight to all the unjustified Kidd-Steph comparisons. This season, people were saying once more that Steph was the lesser of Kidd in the play-offs. Bullcrap! Allan Houston and Tim Thomas were injured, which caused all of Steph's assists to the wing to be bricked by Shandon fudgin' Anderson.</div>
thats a pretty stupid reason. b/c he "cant" shoot and that he was traded for steph. steph was lesser of kidd in the playoffs. if you were talking about the knicks vs nets, then you bring in allen houston and tim thomas' injuries. but if your talking about steph vs kidd, kidd won it easily. steph has enough talent to drive to the basket and make open jumpers, he didnt do that. the injuries had some impact on stephs game possibly, but that much of an impact where he didnt show up in the second half!?!? com'on, he just didnt step up to the plate.