B-Roy
If it takes months
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2008
- Messages
- 31,830
- Likes
- 25,096
- Points
- 113
I agree, overall Nurlic is better. But I also think the gap between them, especially on defense, has been ridiculously inflated around here
as for Nurk's supposed across the board advantages on defense, I'm calling a slight level of BS to that. IMO, The defensive impact of a big man on defense will show up in opponent FG percentages in the paint and at the rim; it simply has to. Well, look at how Portland's opponents have shot at the rim and in the paint over the last 2 seasons:
Portland opponent FG% at the rim (0-3') and NBA rank:
2018-19 - .633 (6th)
2019-20 - .611 (2nd)
Portland opponent FG% in 3-10' zone and NBA rank:
2018-19 - .411 (24th)
2019-20 - .371 (6th)
also, consider that Nurkic last season, had the support of Aminu, Zach, Harkless, & Meyers. Meanwhile Whiteside has had the part time support of Skal, Tolliver, Hezonja, and Melo. Those opponent FG% numbers simply wouldn't look like that if Nurkic was a better rim and paint protector than Whiteside
here's something else, Portland's defensive rating and NBA rank in the Dame/CJ 'era'
2015-16 - 108.0 (20th) - Plumlee, Aminu, Harkless, healthy Ed Davis
2016-17 - 110.8 (24th) - Plumlee>Nurkic, Aminu, Harkless, injured Ed Davis
2017-18 - 106.4 (8th) - Nurkic , Aminu, Harkless, Zach, healthy Ed Davis
2018-19 - 110.5 (16th) - Nurkic , Aminu, Harkless, Zach, Ed Davis gone
2019-20 - 113.2 (26th) - Whiteside, part-time Skal, and nobody else
if Nurkic had the magical effect on the defense that many here claim, we would not have see the Blazer defensive rating get 4.1 points worse from 2017-18 thru 2018-19. Defense is a team game, and Ed Davis had an extremely underrated impact on Portland's defense.
again, all of this isn't to say that Nurkic isn't better than Whiteside. I'm saying he is but the gap between them isn't very big at all. In fact, Whiteside does some things better than Nurkic like rebounding an rim protection and Portland is in desperate need of those right now. Even with Dame going supernova, Portland doesn't win that game last night without Whiteside. All the chatter about Whiteside having hollow stats and empty numbers is about 90% bullshit.
Whiteside takes plays off and has possessions where he absolutely blows it. I remember Zach Lowe defending Jokics defense last year. Basically saying Jokic is generally a good defender, but his bad possessions look so bad it changes people’s perspective of his defense into thinking he’s an awful defender. I think this generally applies to Whiteside as well. He’s a positive defender overall, but sometimes just makes you scratch your head. Something I’ve noticed is that he tends to always look awful in the first quarter but picks it up throughout the gams. Not sure you can change that about him at this point.


