Politics Official 2024 Presidential Election Thread (2 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Who will "Win?"

  • Total voters
    42
JFizzleRaider said:
Click to expand...


Obama was much worse, see Libya, Yemen, Syria. Trump didn't wreck nearly as much mayhem, but also wasn't the peacenick some of his followers wanted him to be. The Biden regime wasn't much different than Trump, except for the fact that he brought us to the brink of nuclear war. (which is kind of a big deal).

Perhaps Trump would have done the same. We'll have to see how it plays out. He says he wants to negotiate an end to the conflict.

It's still a bit amusing to me to see lefties say "nanny nanny boo boo" at what Trump did and ignore what their own side did. At least with Trump, we have a stated desire to end the Russian/Ukraine conflict.
 
beast blazer said:
Steve Bannon: The Hunters are about to become the hunted. This is why it was understood until 15 minutes ago that lawfare was not a good game to play against your political opponent.
Click to expand...


Except one is guilty of crimes and the others are not.

I’m sure they’re shaking in their boots
 
Strenuus said:
WE ARE NOT VICTIMS YOU STUPID FUCK.
Click to expand...
You're free to give up your own property, position, or job opportunity a black person then. But we all know you'd never do any of those things. None of you ever lefties do. You just like to virtue signal. But don't expect others to go along with your pathetic gesticulations.
 
beast blazer said:
Steve Bannon: The Hunters are about to become the hunted. This is why it was understood until 15 minutes ago that lawfare was not a good game to play against your political opponent.
Click to expand...

You are advocating for politicians and the wealthy to be above the law.

Not even trying to hide it anymore, huh?
 
beast blazer said:
Lawfare can be used against anyone. See the book 3 felonies a day.
Click to expand...
If you considered this a serious moral issue you'd be advocating for removing most of those laws rather than cheerleading your masters to engage in what you appear to be claiming as immoral...
 
Phatguysrule said:
You are advocating for politicians and the wealthy to be above the law.

Not even trying to hide it anymore, huh?
Click to expand...

The only reason any of those charges were brought is BECAUSE of who he is, not for what he did. That's lawfare.

You're simply delusional if you don't admit that. Did you see the tape of Nicholas Baise admitting it was lawfare? Even Andrew Cuomo admitted it was lawfare, and he was the former AG of New York.
 
Phatguysrule said:
If you considered this a serious moral issue you'd be advocating for removing most of those laws rather than cheerleading your masters to engage in what you appear to be claiming as immoral...
Click to expand...

Many of those laws should be repealed, or at least enforced in a just way. Legislatures pass laws, agencies create regulations, but those things often stay on the books without being repealed, or are used in a way that is totally outside the spirit of the law.

The fucking Sarbanes-Oxley act was used against those who entered the Capital on Jan 6 for christ's sake.
 
beast blazer said:
The only reason any of those charges were brought is BECAUSE of who he is, not for what he did. That's lawfare.

You're simply delusional if you don't admit that. Did you see the tape of Nicholas Baise admitting it was lawfare? Even Andrew Cuomo admitted it was lawfare, and he was the former AG of New York.
Click to expand...
I advocate that they all be held to the same standard. Either the law should be removed or everyone guilty of breaking it should be punished equally.
 
Phatguysrule said:
I advocate that they all be held to the same standard. Either the law should be removed or everyone guilty of breaking it should be punished equally.
Click to expand...

You're arguing on my side now. No one else was prosecuted for the things they went after Trump for.
 
Pete Hegseth: 20 year military vet, was in active combat, a decorated officers, Ivy League graduate (from two Ivy league schools no less).

Media: HE'S A FOX NEWS HOST!!!

 
beast blazer said:
Pete Hegseth: 20 year military vet, was in active combat, a decorated officers, Ivy League graduate (from two Ivy league schools no less).

Media: HE'S A FOX NEWS HOST!!!

Click to expand...


Hes been the host of a show on Fox for about a decade. Not like hes worked there the last year after his military career.

He's ultra "christian", yet is married to a woman who he cheated on his wife with and had a child with. He's never had a position like this. I hope he does well.
 
beast blazer said:
Pete Hegseth: 20 year military vet, was in active combat, a decorated officers, Ivy League graduate (from two Ivy league schools no less).

Media: HE'S A FOX NEWS HOST!!!

Click to expand...

As per MAGAts, an Ivy League education means you are an "elite" and must be destroyed.....unless of course you're Hawley, or Cruz, or Bush, or Rubio or Trump or any other number of "populist" posers who went to Ivy League schools........so Trump is continuing to staff the American government with "elites". No hypocrisy to be seen here, just keep moving.......
 
UncleCliffy'sDaddy said:
As per MAGAts, an Ivy League education means you are an "elite" and must be destroyed.....unless of course you're Hawley, or Cruz, or Bush, or Rubio or Trump or any other number of "populist" posers who went to Ivy League schools........so Trump is continuing to staff the American government with "elites". No hypocrisy to be seen here, just keep moving.......
Click to expand...

Speaking of hypocrisy, its funny that Kamala got to the top by giving blow jobs, not from being the AG of CA, graduating from Hastings (Cal) law school, being a VP, a US Senator, or a DA. But this new Defense Secretary isnt just a Fox News anchor, he's more than qualified because he was in the military for 20 years and went to an ivy school.
 
GoZers said:
Speaking of hypocrisy, its funny that Kamala got to the top by giving blow jobs, not from being the AG of CA, graduating from Hastings (Cal) law school, being a VP, a US Senator, or a DA. But this new Defense Secretary isnt just a Fox News anchor, he's more than qualified because he was in the military for 20 years and went to an ivy school.
Click to expand...

How do you know he didn't blow Trump?
 
BigGameDamian said:
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
GoZers said:
Hes been the host of a show on Fox for about a decade. Not like hes worked there the last year after his military career.

He's ultra "christian", yet is married to a woman who he cheated on his wife with and had a child with. He's never had a position like this. I hope he does well.
Click to expand...

His career wasn't the military, either, if we want to be accurate. Like Walz, who was a teacher first and a National Guardsman, Hesgeth was a member of the NG. He did tours overseas under fire, but, in peacetime, he did one weekend a month and two weeks per year. It wasn't his vocation, but now he's in charge of those who are soldiers 24/7.
 
PCmor7 said:
His career wasn't the military, either, if we want to be accurate. Like Walz, who was a teacher first and a National Guardsman, Hesgeth was a member of the NG. He did tours overseas under fire, but, in peacetime, he did one weekend a month and two weeks per year. It wasn't his vocation, but now he's in charge of those who are soldiers 24/7.
Click to expand...
Looking into it, I'm surprised at how many recent Secretaries of Defense didn't serve in the military at all, or had a very short military career. Gates, Panetta, Hagel, and Carter all served 0-4 years. None of Clinton's 3 served. Seems like Intelligence Agency service is a more common credential than military service is...which unfortunately, says a lot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Featured content

Back
Top