An agency and it's employees personally profit off the very treatments they propose to the public, and you don't see the conflict of interest?
The FDA doesn't "propose" treatments. They approve drugs that pass the necessary hurdles, yes.
You seem to think the NIH and the FDA are the same agency. They aren't.
A researcher at the NIH getting royalties on some drug she helped discover isn't over at the FDA approving the drug for general use.
The FDA and NIH each have about 18,000 employees. With different responsibilities.
There are outside reviewers. There are audits. There are firewalls.
I'm not saying there's zero chance for corruption, there's always chance for corruption when humans are involved.
But your understanding of the way the agencies function is cartoonish at best.
What Fauci "recommends" turns into policy and mandates.
Well, first off, he's retired now.
Why did he recommend Remdesivir for example? He cited a study in which it was used to treat Ebola, but failed to mention that more people DIED in the Remdesivir treatment group than the placebo group. You can't make this shit up.
No, I can't, but you certainly can.
And we're told to blindy "trust the science" as though Fauci's proclaimations are "the science".
You don't have to blindly trust the science. You can put in the necessary effort to educate yourself, such that you can read the literature at an expert level. It will take you a few years of hard work, but it would be worth it - you wouldn't have to take anyone else's word for it.
But, since you don't know the science, and you aren't going to learn it, the smart thing for you to do would be to, yes, blindly trust the science. That's a better route than blindly listening to, and repeating, the lies and misconceptions of other people who don't know what the fuck they are talking about.
Now the whole public health industry is hyper focused on drugs and vaccines, and has approved a lot of toxic pesiticides and food additives that are illegal in europe.
Gee wiz, do you think the conflict $ interest could be at play here?
Sure, it could be. But you haven't presented any evidence that it is. Speculation isn't worth much.
barfo