- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 45,605
- Likes
- 34,586
- Points
- 113
Mercy! What about Jerome?
He was a mediocre starter by the 92 season, and by 92-93, his role had changed drastically, and by 93/94, he was averaging about 16 minutes a night.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mercy! What about Jerome?
Honestly, it might have been smarter for the Blazers to have kept Drazen, and eventually moved Drexler to the SF spot, and go with Porter, Petro, Drexler, Buck and Duck, and then by the time Buck starts to peter out, Porter, Petro, Drexler, Cliffy and Duck.
And let's say they still signed Rod...Rod, Petro, Drexler, Cliffy and Duckworth is kinda good.
Probably would've prolonged Drexlers peak, and honestly, might have kept them at least somewhat competitive instead of those gawd awful boring post 93 teams.
Absolutely they should have kept Petro, and absolutely CD should have played more SF. Even in 91' their best unit was the 3 guard unit with Porter, Ainge, and Clyde. They just did not use it enough IMO
So Beal made $610,000 last night alone and this Gillespie kid makes $578,000 a SEASON!What a funny win for the Phoenix Suns tonight over the LA Clippers.
50 Million dollar man (Beal) played 15 minutes and scored 0 points. (Beal is owed $53 mil next season, with a player option for $57 mil in 26-27.)
578k man , Collin Gillespie, played the last 14:20 of the game, scored 10 points, and hit a critical 3-pointer with 36 seconds left in the game to put the Suns up by 5, 119-114.
The Suns ended up winning 119-117, so Gillespie's were the last points scored by them.
View attachment 71950
Yes but isn’t he supposed to be good?
Mercy! What about Jerome?
CC doesnt know anything.
Laimbeer wasn’t nobody. Nor was Divac and even Bill Cartwright. Nor Duck, really.Agreed.
The league was guard/wing dominated at that point. Yeah, there was Hakeem, Ewing and Robinson, but who did the Pistons have at 5? Who did the Bulls have at 5? Who did the Lakers have at 5?
Not a dominant big man in the bunch. Only Houston, of the big men who were dominant, won titles in that stretch.
I think Rick saw Petro is a weird Euro guy he couldn't trust (and admittedly, wasn't good at defense). But the teams overall defense was good enough it could have handled Petros so-so defense.
There's a reason why the 91 team lost when it did, and the 92 team did. Not saying Petro starting would've turned the page, but it could've created easier options on offense for Drexler and Porter. Jerome, Buck and Duck were not exactly known as offensive threats.
Laimbeer wasn’t nobody. Nor was Divac and even Bill Cartwright. Nor Duck, really.
That's neat, but Laimbeer, Divac, Cartright and Duck weren't dominant...which was my fucking point.
WHAT ABOUT SHAQ?!?!?!?!?!
He didn't win a title until 2000. The league was a guard dominated league in the 80's and for most of the 90's.
How dare you insult Manute Bol like that.