How are you trying to explain to me the point behind you disagreeing with me? The topic is my point since thats what you're saying is wrong. You're trying to tell me what my premise is when you dont understand it...
And im telling you most disagree with you including me. Stop arguing the semantics man.
Geez bones. You have got to stop thinking you are always right with your opinions. Just agree to disagree if you are going to be soooo steadfast.
Most people feel a super team is what it is because of the sum of its parts. If you lose some of the sum, then they aren't as good and wont win. Thus wont get ratings.
If you don't agree just disagree but remember its your opinion and its a pretty minority one.
Do you ever concede a majority opinion as maybe being more logical than yours when you are of the minority, or do you put up a wall and refuse to acknowledge common sense from the majority?
Or lets just do a checklist.
Woukd curry and green be a superteam on thier own? No. Would they win? No
Would kd Nd green be a super team? No. Would they win, no.
Add thompson to either pair. Would they win? Possibly, one did. Are they are superteam? Possibly...did they win?
Now put them all together And its a superteam.
Or another example. Was the lakers a superteam with shaq kobe, malone and payton?
I would have considered that a superteam of sorts, but they didn't win. Thier rating also werent all that. Why? They didnt win.
Winning creates ratings. Take away the third best player on any superteam and there is a chance that team cant win then and this their ratings will fall.
I believe that is the consensus opinion of most.
If you disagree with that, then just say you disagree and move on, however what i stated is pretty logical and i bet could be verified with research.
