PDXFonz
I’m listening
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 20,342
- Likes
- 17,062
- Points
- 113
Fair and valid points. But…Blazers were 2-2 without Lillard. Mavs would be one of the worst teams in the NBA without Luka.
You could make an argument that Lillard in many ways is better than Luka, and yes you could argue Lillard ultimately contributes more to winning. Others could make many arguments the other direction.
Ultimately their both clear elite stars in this game. Personally I'd put Luka a bit above Dame mostly just for his physical size, as well as his youth which gives him more potential to improve. I don't believe Luka can really be overrated when he's a clear top5 player in this league.
If your saying Luka is not a winner then surely Dame isn't either. Luka at 23 carried his teams to the WCF last year winning a game. 32 year old Lillard never has.
The 2019-20 and 2021-22 seasons have been the weakest postseasons in a while. Biggest window we’ve seen in perhaps 20 years.
2013-14 Blazers (Year Dame hit the 0.9) could have won it either of those last two years. We’d have smashed the L*kers in the first round.
