[Official] Nurkić Watch Thread

[Orion Bailey]

Keep in mind "good" is a subjective term.

For example:

I took a really good shit this morning.

BNM

I was hoping for some sort of counter on what good actually means.

I hope he knows I was playin....like always.

 

[Nate]

Where did I say he needs to like him????"
I'm simply saying calling BNM a troll is not accurate at all. I dont think calling BNM a troll is an opinion personally, but. eh I dont care enough to worry about it. I get what I want from him anyhow, so....

Wait. That didn't sound good at all....

I never called him a troll.... so....

He frequently writes unnecessarily long posts. Like the post he made in response to yuyuza in this thread. He likes to write, A LOT. He likes his writing so much, he puts a sig after every one lol. Just in case someone forgets who's post they're reading after the 12th drawn out paragraph.

But it's ok. I guess you think his posts are adequately long, every single time.

And he definitely tried arguing that crabbe isn't a good shooter. I'm not gonna look for it. But he did.

Now he's going to post a long ass response showing that he didn't do that. But instead, only argued that crabbe only does one thing, and wasn't doing it well at a particular time, blah blah blah.

That's true too. He did say that.

But he also tried arguing that crabbe isnt a good shooter. It's not a big deal.

 

[KingSpeed]

Let's keep this thread on topic please.

 

[Boob-No-More]

I never called him a troll.... so....

He frequently writes unnecessarily long posts. Like the post he made in response to yuyuza in this thread.

I responded to his comment that the Nukic situation reminds him of the Roy situation when he specifically said:

This whole situation reminds me of the time BRoy got hurt before the PHX series and came back 6 days after tearing his meniscus. ugh

Was never really the same after that

I interpreted that comment to mean he was concerned that Nukic could also reinjure himself and also "never be the same".

My response was three short paragraphs (202 words - not 12 paragraphs, not 4000 words) explaining why the risk to Kurkic was much less than it was to Roy.

If you can't be bothered to read three short paragraphs, then don't. Or, you could write another seven paragraph post complaining about my unnecessarily long three paragraph post.

BNM

 

[Scalma]

I responded to his comment that the Nukic situation reminds him of the Roy situation when he specifically said:



I interpreted that comment to mean he was concerned that Nukic could also reinjure himself and also "never be the same".

My response was three short paragraphs (202 words - not 12 paragraphs, not 4000 words) explaining why the risk to Kurkic was much less than it was to Roy.

If you can't be bothered to read three short paragraphs, then don't. Or, you could write another seven paragraph post complaining about my unnecessarily long three paragraph post.

BNM

So many words.

 

[Orion Bailey]

I never called him a troll.... so....

He frequently writes unnecessarily long posts. Like the post he made in response to yuyuza in this thread. He likes to write, A LOT. He likes his writing so much, he puts a sig after every one lol. Just in case someone forgets who's post they're reading after the 12th drawn out paragraph.

But it's ok. I guess you think his posts are adequately long, every single time.

And he definitely tried arguing that crabbe isn't a good shooter. I'm not gonna look for it. But he did.

Now he's going to post a long ass response showing that he didn't do that. But instead, only argued that crabbe only does one thing, and wasn't doing it well at a particular time, blah blah blah.

That's true too. He did say that.

But he also tried arguing that crabbe isnt a good shooter. It's not a big deal.

You are right. No big deal. Not even a deal big enough to have a page long discussion on the lengths of posts.
Show me anyone that has 100% perfect posts, and I will show you flawed judging.

Some people like to be concise, some people like more explanations. to each their own, but you did say his long posts were his way of trolling. How is that not calling him a troll? Just sayin...

At any rate, Nurks posts would annihilate this whole forum with just one sentence...

so there IS 1 person who could post perfectly 100% of the time I guess...

 

[Nate]

I responded to his comment that the Nukic situation reminds him of the Roy situation when he specifically said:



I interpreted that comment to mean he was concerned that Nukic could also reinjure himself and also "never be the same".

My response was three short paragraphs (202 words - not 12 paragraphs, not 4000 words) explaining why the risk to Kurkic was much less than it was to Roy.

If you can't be bothered to read three short paragraphs, then don't. Or, you could write another seven paragraph post complaining about my unnecessarily long three paragraph post.

BNM

Ok buddy. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings so much.

 

[Nate]

You are right. No big deal. Not even a deal big enough to have a page long discussion on the lengths of posts.
Show me anyone that has 100% perfect posts, and I will show you flawed judging.

Some people like to be concise, some people like more explanations. to each their own, but you did say his long posts were his way of trolling. How is that not calling him a troll? Just sayin...

At any rate, Nurks posts would annihilate this whole forum with just one sentence...

so there IS 1 person who could post perfectly 100% of the time I guess...

If Jeffery Dahmer does something nice, does that make him a nice guy?

Or does make him an asshole, that did a nice thing?

 

[Nate]

Ah, I forgot my sig.

NATE

 

[HomerLovesKoolAid]

BNM,
You obviously need a special forum section for watered down versions of your posts for the TV babies, or reading challenged.
Or, issue some brief summaries daily, maybe call them "Boob's Notes", so people wouldn't fail the tests.

 

[Orion Bailey]

If Jeffery Dahmer does something nice, does that make him a nice guy?

Or does make him an asshole, that did a nice thing?

Ah, I forgot my sig.

NATE

You said his way of. Not he did it once... Come on now. Your passive aggressiveness is not very mysterious.

But hey, We are all fans right?

 

[BlazerCaravan]

Let's keep this thread on topic please.

Ah, I forgot my sig.

NATE

I'm only going to say this once (hopefully):
Kingspeed is being the calm and reasonable one here. Let that sink in.

 

[Orion Bailey]

I'm only going to say this once (hopefully):
Kingspeed is being the calm and reasonable one here. Let that sink in.

The day King sits back with Popcorn to watch the drama unfold is the day ...

Shit. Its today!!!!! Im buying a lotto ticket!!!!

 

[illmatic99]

Let's keep this thread on topic please.

Forreal man. Yall need to chill. I like @Boob-No-More and his posts

 

[Boob-No-More]

So many words.

I repeat:

Fuck off.

BNM

 

[Boob-No-More]

Ok buddy. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings so much.

First, you didn't hurt my feelings.

Second: you aren't sorry.

Third: fuck off.

Concise enough for you?

BNM

 

[illmatic99]

Whats the likelihood Nurk actually plays on wed?

 

[Strenuus]

You are right. No big deal. Not even a deal big enough to have a page long discussion on the lengths of posts.
Show me anyone that has 100% perfect posts, and I will show you flawed judging.

Some people like to be concise, some people like more explanations. to each their own, but you did say his long posts were his way of trolling. How is that not calling him a troll? Just sayin...

At any rate, Nurks posts would annihilate this whole forum with just one sentence...

so there IS 1 person who could post perfectly 100% of the time I guess...

I write perfect posts.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

And you just made the list....




I am all calm. Doesn't change the relevance of what I said though.

And your "like when he said" is way off base and not accurate. I read almost all of his posts, because almost all of them are quality.

Smoooochass

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

Let's keep this thread on topic please.

No way, this shit is hilarious

 

[Scalma]

I repeat:

Fuck off.

BNM

Are you sure you actually laugh at yourself?

 

[Nate]

First, you didn't hurt my feelings.

Second: you aren't sorry.

Third: fuck off.

Concise enough for you?

BNM

No.

That.

Was.

Way.

Too.

Long.

NATE

 

[Nate]

You said his way of. Not he did it once... Come on now. Your passive aggressiveness is not very mysterious.

But hey, We are all fans right?

Jesus Christ lol.

Get over it.

NATE

 

[Jade Falcon]

I never called him a troll.... so....

He frequently writes unnecessarily long posts. Like the post he made in response to yuyuza in this thread. He likes to write, A LOT. He likes his writing so much, he puts a sig after every one lol. Just in case someone forgets who's post they're reading after the 12th drawn out paragraph.

But it's ok. I guess you think his posts are adequately long, every single time.

And he definitely tried arguing that crabbe isn't a good shooter. I'm not gonna look for it. But he did.

Now he's going to post a long ass response showing that he didn't do that. But instead, only argued that crabbe only does one thing, and wasn't doing it well at a particular time, blah blah blah.

That's true too. He did say that.

But he also tried arguing that crabbe isnt a good shooter. It's not a big deal.

Bruh, have you seen some of my posts? I am the KING of long posts on this forum! Nobody does a better long-form response than me.

Let's keep this thread on topic please.

Yeah, this. We need Nurk in here to clean out this thread. A mere look from our Destroyer Of Worlds should do just nicely.

What's the latest on Nurk, anyways?

 

[KingSpeed]

Guys. Get a room. This is where we come for Nurkic updates.

 

[Reep]

Guys. Get a room. This is where we come for Nurkic updates.

This +1+2*23!

Nobody wants to hear your little spat. PM if you need to let's anticipate the greatest entrance since . . . what's his face from that team a long time ago . . . came into the game from injury . . . you know, like that.

 

[Minstrel]

This is how you honor Nurkic? With trolling and counter-trolling?

Actually, he might appreciate that.

 

[BrunoSOC]

@jwquick: Terry Stotts says Nurkic "not ready to play yet." Says too early to say whether he will play in series.

So... He said that yesterday. Game 3 or 2 for him?

 

[Jade Falcon]

@jwquick: Terry Stotts says Nurkic "not ready to play yet." Says too early to say whether he will play in series.

So... He said that yesterday. Game 3 or 2 for him?

Looks like my prediction is coming along nicely. I predicted he'd be out the first 2 games, and would be back in game 3, but rusty. We'll lose the series in either game 5 or 6.

 

[BrunoSOC]

I expected him comeback game2. I Will pray for that