Not complaining at all barf. Just sharing how government will make you health care decisions if you give it over to them.
Which is cheaper? Government always uses this as the criteria unless they have other higher priority criterion.
1. Do the bugger.
2. Treat him with the latest technology.
You are the one that likes the government.
I prefer the Constitution. It gives the government no role in this business. If you wish, and enough agree, then an amendment could spell out the objectives if you wish make health care the Federal governments business.
Not complaining at all barf. Just sharing how government will make you health care decisions if you give it over to them.
Which is cheaper? Government always uses this as the criteria unless they have other higher priority criterion.
You are the one that likes the government.
I prefer the Constitution. It gives the government no role in this business. If you wish, and enough agree, then an amendment could spell out the objectives if you wish make health care the Federal governments business.
Whatever. Pretty sure if Medicaid was unconstitutional, some MarAzul would have gotten the supreme court to declare it such, sometime in the past several decades.
Shouldn't they? Isn't that exactly what you want them to do? Would a private insurance company do differently?
I don't know what that means.
Whatever. Pretty sure if Medicaid was unconstitutional, some MarAzul would have gotten the supreme court to declare it such, sometime in the past several decades.