- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,412
- Likes
- 43,903
- Points
- 113
How does that make Sam hypocritical? At best, you're arguing that the media (or whomever you mean as the public) is being hypocritical.
Fair point. I'm assuming that Michael Sam would also have had a problem with Dungy saying what he said. I could be wrong.
You may want to re-read what I wrote. I never accused you of bigotry or being in favor of it.
If I believed that trying to change prejudice is bad, then it would follow that I believe the prejudice itself is acceptable.
I said that you see "trying to change perceptions" as a failing, which seems reasonable from this:
You said you're waiting for someone who's comfortable enough in their homosexuality to not attempt to change perceptions. How is it an unfair reading to draw from that that you consider "attempting to change perceptions" as a negative? You're saying you see trying to change perceptions as a positive but would like to see an athlete not do that?To rephrase, "what I'm waiting for" is the gay athlete who is comfortable enough with his homosexuality to feel neither the need to hide reality nor attempt to change perception, but to simply be an athlete who happens insignificantly to be gay, rather than be, significantly, a gay athlete.
It's a fine line, but what I'm saying is that I have yet to see a (male) gay athlete who is simply willing to be openly gay without making a public spectacle of it (there have been many on the female side, and I find that dichotomy fascinating as well). I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with someone attempting to change public perception, but it would also be nice to see a gay athlete who isn't trying to change things, but is OK with simply being gay.



Can't see your point here.